review-mode

Analyze roadmaps, code, and strategies to identify flaws and risks.

18|3|Updated Nov 13, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mystilleef/gemini-cli-modes --skill review-mode
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-mode
Source: https://github.com/mystilleef/gemini-cli-modes/tree/main/skills/review-mode
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mystilleef/gemini-cli-modes --skill review-mode

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams identify flaws, risks, and improvements in roadmaps, code, and strategies through structured, expert reviews.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured, multi-perspective critique of technical plans, implementations, and policies.
  • Enforces strict read-only mode to prevent unintended changes during analysis.
  • Generates actionable feedback and risk assessments aligned with safety and quality objectives.

Quick Start

Provide a critical review request for a roadmap or proposed changes and let the system perform a comprehensive critique.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-mode

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a structured code review to identify architectural risks?

A structured code review identifies architectural risks by applying multi-perspective analysis to technical plans. It enforces a read-only workflow to rigorously scrutinize infrastructure changes without risking unintended modifications to the codebase.

What is the best way to critique a software roadmap for hidden flaws?

Critiquing a software roadmap for hidden flaws requires a multi-perspective analysis of the proposed strategy. This process generates actionable feedback and risk assessments aligned with your project's safety and quality assurance objectives.

Can I analyze infrastructure plans without accidentally modifying the deployment configuration?

Yes, you can analyze infrastructure plans safely by using a strict read-only review workflow. This approach ensures rigorous scrutiny of architectural changes while preventing unintended modifications to your deployment configuration.

Does multi-perspective risk assessment work for evaluating quality assurance strategies?

Multi-perspective risk assessment works effectively for evaluating quality assurance strategies. It analyzes proposed policies to identify potential flaws and generates actionable feedback aligned with your overarching safety and quality objectives.

How do I review architectural changes to ensure they meet safety objectives?

Reviewing architectural changes for safety objectives involves a structured critique of the technical implementation. This multi-perspective analysis identifies potential risks and improvements, ensuring the architecture aligns with rigorous quality standards.