skills.rest
myrtlepn
myrtlepnCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

review

Review code implementations against acceptance criteria and create tasks for gaps.

24|5|Updated Feb 14, 2026
Search Tags:#quality assurance#code review#software development#acceptance criteria#gap analysis#automated testing
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/myrtlepn/gran-maestro --skill review-myrtlepn
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/myrtlepn/gran-maestro/tree/main/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/myrtlepn/gran-maestro --skill review-myrtlepn

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the rigorous review process for code implementations, ensuring they meet acceptance criteria, adhere to architectural standards, and maintain UI/UX consistency, thereby reducing bugs and rework.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Acceptance Criteria (AC) Verification: Checks if the implemented code fulfills all defined ACs.
  • Multi-faceted Code Review: Conducts parallel reviews for code quality, architectural integrity, and UI/UX design.
  • Gap Identification & Task Creation: Automatically creates new tasks for any identified gaps or issues, facilitating iterative improvement.
  • Use Case: After a developer implements a new feature, this Skill can automatically review the code against the requirements, flag any deviations or quality issues, and create follow-up tasks for the developer or QA team, all before the code is merged.

Quick Start

Run a review for request REQ-001.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify code implementation against acceptance criteria automatically?▼

Verifying code implementation against acceptance criteria is done by performing iterative reviews that check AC fulfillment and conduct parallel code, architecture, and UI reviews. Identified gaps automatically generate new tasks for iterative improvement.

How does automated gap analysis work for code review?▼

Automated gap analysis during code review works by identifying deviations from acceptance criteria and architectural standards, then automatically creating new tasks for those gaps to facilitate follow-up development.

Can I use this to review architectural integrity and UI consistency together?▼

Yes, you can review architectural integrity and UI consistency together through multi-faceted parallel code reviews. This ensures implementations adhere to architectural standards and maintain UI/UX design consistency simultaneously.

What is the best way to trigger a code quality review for a specific request?▼

The best way to trigger a code quality review for a specific request is by invoking the review command with the request identifier, enabling an approval loop that verifies implementation completeness.

Does this code review skill require external dependencies?▼

No, this code review skill does not require any external dependencies to verify acceptance criteria or conduct multi-faceted architecture and UI reviews.

When should I run an automated code review in the software development lifecycle?▼

You should run an automated code review after a developer implements a new feature and before the code is merged, ensuring it meets acceptance criteria and reducing rework.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
sarimofficialsarimofficial

phase-workflow-runner

Audit, fill gaps, test, and report readiness for the next project phase.

Community
Advanced
javierhbrjavierhbr

run-with-ralph

Automate iterative openspec task implementation with Ralph Wiggum loops.

Community
Advanced
0xRayAI0xRayAI

testing-strategy

Analyze software test coverage and design testing strategies for unit, integration, and end-to-end scenarios.

Official
Intermediate
aydinsenturkkaydinsenturkk
3

sw-review

Analyze git diffs against project rules to identify vulnerabilities and compliance issues.

Community
Advanced