Audit codebases and pull requests with a standardized checklist and automated screening.
npx skills add https://github.com/NachoOsella/DotFiles-V4 --skill review-nachoosella
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: review Source: https://github.com/NachoOsella/DotFiles-V4/tree/main/pi/.pi/agent/skills/review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/NachoOsella/DotFiles-V4 --skill review-nachoosella
Reviews codebases or pull requests and provides structured feedback on correctness, security, performance, maintainability, testing, and documentation. This guidance helps teams audit changes before merging, catch regressions early, and raise the quality bar for code proposals.
Run the review workflow on a PR to generate a structured findings report.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Perform a structured code review by applying a standardized checklist covering correctness, security, performance, maintainability, testing, and documentation. This process generates actionable findings with severity classifications and remediation steps suitable for triage.
Automated code screening runs project tooling like linters and static analysis to surface issues before manual review. It reviews references for deeper context, ensuring manual reviewers focus on complex logic rather than basic formatting or syntax violations.
Yes, you can audit a multi-language codebase for security and maintainability gaps. The review workflow applies across languages and tech stacks supported by standard linters, validating implementation and identifying missing tests or documentation.
The best way to catch regressions early before merging code changes is implementing a pre-merge review workflow. This systematically audits proposals against a comprehensive checklist, raising the quality bar and preventing defects from entering the main branch.
Yes, the code review process works with existing static analysis tools. It integrates automated screening using your project's configured linters and tooling to surface issues before applying the comprehensive manual checklist for deeper context.
Format code review findings for stakeholders using a standardized template that includes severity classification and concrete remediation steps. This structured feedback approach ensures clear communication of issues across correctness, security, and maintainability dimensions.
gradigitScreens GitHub repositories in sandbox environments and generates a Markdown report.
ZenkakuHiraganaIdentify and prioritize defects and maintainability issues in code diffs.
auldsyababuaValidate Markdown files for syntax, links, and formatting standards.
matteocervelliScan codebases for secrets, vulnerable dependencies, and insecure patterns.
