Run a four-agent DD review workflow and generate a structured summary with consensus and risk.
npx skills add https://github.com/nomoory/brain-in-a-vat --skill review-nomoory
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: review Source: https://github.com/nomoory/brain-in-a-vat/tree/main/.claude/skills/review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nomoory/brain-in-a-vat --skill review-nomoory
Facilitates rigorous quality verification by executing a multi-perspective review workflow that surfaces bias, gaps, and conflicting conclusions across code, design, and documentation artifacts.
Run a multi-perspective DD review on the target artifact and produce a structured synthesis.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Multi-perspective DD review is a quality assurance workflow that evaluates architecture and documentation artifacts by diverging viewpoints, challenging assumptions, and synthesizing findings to expose bias, gaps, and conflicting conclusions. It generates a structured summary with consensus levels and risk signals.
To run a multi-perspective review on architecture artifacts, execute the four-agent workflow: diverge viewpoints, challenge assumptions, process challenge-responses, and synthesize findings. This produces a consolidated assessment that captures consensus levels and identifies governance risks.
Yes, you can apply the multi-perspective review workflow to initiative definitions and cross-project documentation. It evaluates diverse viewpoints to improve decision quality and outputs a structured review summary highlighting consensus levels and risk signals.
The best way to surface bias and gaps in design documentation is applying a phase-based DD review workflow. By diverging perspectives and challenging assumptions before synthesis, it rigorously verifies quality and exposes conflicting conclusions across cross-domain artifacts.
No specific dependencies are required to execute the multi-perspective review workflow. It operates as a standalone process to evaluate code, design, and documentation artifacts, requiring only the target artifact to initiate the four-agent diverge, challenge, and synthesis phases.
nikhilvallishayeeCollide multiple perspectives to generate emergent insights for complex problems.
GustaPaesReviews software stories and produces quality gate decisions.
trevorbyrumAssess software project production readiness across 12 dimensions with a scored verdict.
tuandzungCreates structured work plans through strategic planning, consensus loops, and review assessments.
