skills.rest
NSEvteev
NSEvteevCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

review

Unify local branch and GitHub PR reviews into a single workflow.

31|5|Updated Jan 14, 2026
Search Tags:#automation#git#workflow#review#quality-assurance#code-review#pull-request
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/NSEvteev/FullSpec --skill review-nsevteev
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/NSEvteev/FullSpec/tree/main/.claude/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/NSEvteev/FullSpec --skill review-nsevteev

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code review is often split between local branch review and GitHub PR review. This skill unifies both steps into a single, cohesive workflow to streamline validation and feedback before pushing or merging.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Unified review flow for local branches and PRs, ensuring consistent feedback and validation across the development cycle.
  • Orchestrates per-service review steps and produces an aggregated verdict to guide merge decisions.
  • Integrates with repository documentation to maintain traceability and governance.

Quick Start

Review the current branch or open PR using the unified code-review workflow before pushing or merging.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a local code review for a Git branch before pushing?▼

A unified code review combines branch and PR validation into a single workflow before merging. It coordinates parallel code-reviewer agents per service, applies validation prerequisites, and produces an aggregated verdict to ensure consistent feedback across the development cycle.

Can I use this to review pull requests across multiple services simultaneously?▼

Yes, this unified code review workflow supports pull requests by running parallel code-reviewer agents per service. It coordinates per-service validation blocks and aggregates their results into a final verdict, ensuring comprehensive multi-service PR coverage.

What's the best way to automate quality assurance checks for code merges?▼

Automate quality assurance by applying the unified code review workflow before merging. It enforces standard-review prerequisites, runs per-service validation blocks, and generates an aggregated verdict to ensure merge readiness across branches and PRs.

Do I need specific validation files to start the code review workflow?▼

Yes, the code review workflow follows validation-review.md and standard-review.md prerequisites. These repository documentation files must exist to maintain traceability, establish governance, and provide the validation steps required before the review status updates.

Why does my branch validation produce a blocked status during code review?▼

A blocked status occurs when per-service validation steps fail during the unified code review. The workflow coordinates these per-service blocks individually before pushing or merging, and any failed block prevents the final aggregated verdict from passing.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
solitasrohsolitasroh
2

phase-8-review

Identify architecture and convention mismatches across MCU/MPU/WPF projects.

Community
Advanced
bonnguyenitcbonnguyenitc
19

finishing-a-development-branch

Verify tests and finalize a feature branch with merge, PR, keep, or discard options.

Community
Advanced
gannonhgannonh
1

pr-reviews

Automate pull request reviews by launching specialized agents on git diffs.

Community
Advanced
0xtaoist0xtaoist

ln-510-quality-coordinator

Orchestrate end-to-end code quality checks across LN components with storyId input.

Community
Advanced