skills.rest
pcatattacks
pcatattacksCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
Website𝕏@pcatattacksGitHub

review

Review code, specifications, or designs and output a structured feedback report.

14|1|Updated Feb 20, 2026
Search Tags:#design#feedback#security#quality#review#spec#code
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/pcatattacks/solopreneur-plugin --skill review-pcatattacks
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/pcatattacks/solopreneur-plugin/tree/main/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/pcatattacks/solopreneur-plugin --skill review-pcatattacks

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Review code, specifications, or designs to identify defects, security risks, and adherence to best practices, reducing review cycles and risk.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated multi-perspective reviews across code, specs, and design artifacts.
  • Parallel delegation to specialized roles (e.g., @engineer, @qa, @design, @bizops) with structured severity tagging.
  • Actionable feedback reports that map findings to concrete improvements and acceptance criteria.
  • Use Case: You receive a PR, a specs document, or a design draft and need a fast, thorough evaluation with recommended fixes.

Quick Start

Provide the artifact path or description to review, and the skill will generate a structured feedback report.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a structured code review on a pull request?▼

A structured code review analyzes a pull request by applying parallel, role-based delegation to specialized roles like engineer and QA. It identifies defects and security risks, then outputs a concise feedback report with actionable recommendations and acceptance criteria.

Can I review design artifacts and specifications for security risks and defects?▼

Yes, you can review design artifacts and specifications for security risks and defects. The process evaluates specs and designs across software engineering, design, and product contexts to identify best-practice gaps and map findings to concrete improvements.

What is the best way to automate multi-perspective feedback for a specs document?▼

The best way to automate multi-perspective feedback for a specs document is using parallel delegation to specialized roles like engineer, QA, design, and bizops. This structured review applies severity tagging to deliver concise, actionable feedback reports.

Does this review process work for both code and product design contexts?▼

Yes, this review process works for both code and product design contexts. It performs structured quality reviews across software engineering, design, and product artifacts, evaluating adherence to best practices and reducing overall review cycles and risk.

How do I get actionable recommendations from a design draft evaluation?▼

You get actionable recommendations from a design draft evaluation by providing the artifact description for structured review. The system outputs a feedback report that maps identified findings to concrete improvements and specific acceptance criteria.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
Aken-TeamsAken-Teams

Reviewer Agent

Review generated documents and produce structured feedback with strengths and issues.

Official
Intermediate
jaydubya818jaydubya818

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Analyze provided content to surface gaps and risks in a findings report.

Community
Advanced
elijahmurrayelijahmurray
2

pr-review

Check out pull request branches, review code changes, and apply feedback.

Community
Basic
AI-SafeterAI-Safeter
10

code-reviewer

Identify defects, security gaps, and maintainability risks in codebases.

Community
Advanced