One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/petekp/circuit-next --skill review-petekp
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/petekp/circuit-next/tree/main/plugins/circuit/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/petekp/circuit-next --skill review-petekp

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It helps you quickly understand risks, quality, and outcomes in existing code, diffs, PRs, plans, or reports—without spending time writing new changes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Audit-only review: Produces a structured audit of an existing implementation, plan, or risk surface without proceeding to implement changes.
  • Evidence-driven reporting: Collects intake evidence (including optional untracked content when explicitly requested) and generates a final Markdown summary from the operator output.
  • Workflow orchestration: Runs a deterministic multi-stage review path (Intake → Independent Audit → Decision) and relays audit work through the configured connector.

Use cases include: reviewing a PR for regressions and safety risks, auditing an implementation outline for completeness, or assessing a plan/report for operational and technical weaknesses.

Quick Start

Ask Circuit to run the review flow on your scope and request an audit-only report focused on risk, correctness, and gaps.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit code changes in a pull request without implementing fixes?

Audit-only review runs a deterministic workflow (Intake → Independent Audit → Decision) over PR diffs, producing evidence-based findings and a Markdown summary without generating new changes.

What is a diff analysis workflow for assessing pull request safety risks?

Diff analysis for pull request safety uses an audit-only workflow that collects intake evidence from modified files and generates a final summary focused on regressions, risks, and gaps.

Can I review untracked files when auditing a proposed changeset?

Yes, untracked contents can be optionally included in the audit intake when explicitly requested, alongside tracked modified files, to provide a complete evidence base for the review.

How do I perform technical due diligence on an implementation plan or report?

Technical due diligence on plans or reports runs a multi-stage audit path that evaluates operational and technical weaknesses, outputting structured findings sourced from the operator summary.

Does the code review workflow support safe CLI invocation with user-supplied text?

Yes, the code review workflow requires safe CLI invocation with correctly escaped user text to ensure deterministic processing during the independent audit and decision stages.

When should I use an audit-only review instead of an implementation workflow?

Use audit-only review when you need evidence-driven risk assessment, quality audits, or gap analysis over existing code, diffs, or plans without generating any new changes.