review-plan

Adversarial code review is performed using multiple specialized critic agents to hunt for architectural gaps, security risks, and scope creep before any code is written. The agents run in parallel and merge findings into an actionable feedback report.

The best way to identify architectural flaws and scope creep is through adversarial plan review, which subjects development plans to rigorous multi-perspective critique. This process validates high-assurance planning by automatically reconciling feedback into a single report.

Yes, you can use adversarial plan review to check for Swift concurrency issues. The critique process specifically targets potential Swift 6.2 concurrency issues, missing test coverage, and architectural violations in your proposed development plan.

You stress-test a development plan by applying adversarial review techniques that simulate multiple independent critics. This orchestration requires the Workflow tool to execute agents in parallel and validate findings against schemas before reconciling them.

Yes, you need the Workflow tool to orchestrate multi-agent code plan reviews. The adversarial review process relies on the Workflow tool to execute parallel agent runs and perform schema-validated feedback reconciliation.

You should not use adversarial plan critique for simple tasks, as it is designed for complex software development workflows requiring high-assurance planning and validation. It prevents over-engineering by rigorously validating plans before implementation begins.