review-plan

Validate technical implementation plans across five parallel analysis dimensions.

Updated Jul 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/arthrod/conejo-skills --skill review-plan-arthrod
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-plan
Source: https://github.com/arthrod/conejo-skills/tree/main/skills/review-plan
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/arthrod/conejo-skills --skill review-plan-arthrod

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill mitigates the risk of flawed implementation by subjecting technical plans to a rigorous, multi-dimensional audit before any code is written.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel Analysis: Simultaneously evaluates parallelization potential, TDD adherence, type safety, library best practices, and security.
  • Automated Feedback: Generates a structured report identifying critical, major, and minor issues with actionable fix suggestions.
  • Use Case: Before starting a complex feature, use this skill to verify that your implementation plan follows the team's testing doctrine and avoids common security pitfalls.

Quick Start

Use the review-plan skill to audit the implementation plan located at docs/plans/feature-auth.md.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-plan

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a technical implementation plan for code quality and security before development?

To audit an implementation plan for architecture and code quality, this skill orchestrates five parallel agents that analyze parallelization, TDD compliance, type safety, library usage, and security. It parses your plan files and generates a structured report identifying critical, major, and minor issues with actionable fix suggestions.

What is automated multi-agent plan review and how does it work?

Automated multi-agent plan review is the process of validating technical implementation plans using parallel analysis agents. This skill deploys five agents to simultaneously evaluate parallelization potential, TDD adherence, type safety, library best practices, and security, ensuring architectural integrity before any code is actually written.

How do I check if my software implementation plan follows TDD compliance and type safety doctrines?

Checking TDD compliance and type safety in an implementation plan requires systematic parsing of the plan documents against project doctrines. This skill uses specialized parallel agents to evaluate testing adherence and type safety alongside security and library usage, returning categorized issues and fix suggestions.

Can I use automated plan review for complex software engineering workflows and architecture validation?

Yes, automated plan review is designed for software engineering workflows where architectural integrity and code quality are paramount. It applies to complex features by integrating specialized code-review skills to ensure the implementation plan adheres to project-specific doctrines regarding parallelization and security.

What is the best way to identify security pitfalls and library misuse in a feature plan?

The best way to identify security pitfalls and library misuse in a feature plan is through a rigorous multi-dimensional audit. This skill applies parallel agents to simultaneously evaluate library best practices and security vulnerabilities, generating a structured report that categorizes issues by severity.

What are the limitations of automated implementation plan analysis?

Automated implementation plan analysis requires systematic parsing of plan files and integration with specialized code-review skills to function properly. It is limited to validating architectural integrity and code quality pre-coding, meaning it cannot detect runtime issues that only emerge after actual code execution begins.