review-plan

Review drafted plans for gaps and risks across ten defined dimensions.

2|Updated Dec 20, 2020
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/buvis/home --skill review-plan-buvis
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-plan
Source: https://github.com/buvis/home/tree/main/.claude/skills/review-plan
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/buvis/home --skill review-plan-buvis

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps teams identify gaps, risks, and ambiguities in a plan by providing a structured, iterative critique.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Systematic evaluation across completeness, feasibility, implementation clarity, dependencies, testing, deployment, documentation, timelines, resources, and security.
  • Generates targeted clarifying questions to tighten the plan and drive decision-making.
  • Use Case: After drafting a plan in plan mode, review-plan guides you to surface risks and ambiguities, then prompts with follow-up questions to reach a ready-to-execute plan.

Quick Start

Provide your current plan in the chat and say 'review plan' to receive a structured critique.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-plan

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a project plan to identify gaps and risks?

Plan review involves systematically evaluating a drafted plan across completeness, feasibility, implementation clarity, dependencies, testing, deployment, documentation, timelines, resources, and security to surface risks and ambiguities before execution.

What is a structured plan critique and how does it work?

A structured plan critique systematically evaluates a drafted project plan across predefined dimensions like completeness, feasibility, and security, then generates iterative clarifying questions to resolve ambiguities and drive decision-making.

How do I assess project feasibility and resource gaps in a drafted plan?

Assess project feasibility and resource gaps by applying an iterative review mechanism that evaluates the plan's timelines, resources, and implementation clarity, prompting targeted follow-up questions to resolve any ambiguities found.

Can I use clarifying questions to tighten project management plans?

Yes, you can use clarifying questions to tighten project management plans by iteratively prompting decision-makers after an initial evaluation, systematically addressing ambiguities in dependencies, testing, and deployment to reach a ready-to-execute state.

What dimensions should a plan review cover for deployment and security?

A comprehensive plan review for deployment and security should cover completeness, feasibility, implementation clarity, dependencies, testing, deployment processes, documentation, timelines, resources, and security protocols to ensure full project readiness.

When do I need an iterative plan critique before project execution?

You need an iterative plan critique before project execution when your drafted plan has potential gaps, unclear dependencies, or ambiguous timelines, requiring targeted clarifying questions to reach a ready-to-execute state.