review-plan

Validate that a generated plan covers every specification requirement.

25|4|Updated Dec 11, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/CaptainCrouton89/crouton-kit --skill review-plan-captaincrouton89
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-plan
Source: https://github.com/CaptainCrouton89/crouton-kit/tree/main/plugins/rpi/skills/review-plan
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/CaptainCrouton89/crouton-kit --skill review-plan-captaincrouton89

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Validate that a generated plan fully covers every specification, preventing gaps and misinterpretations that could derail implementation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Requirement coverage validation: maps spec behaviors to plan actions and flags missing or ambiguous items.
  • Ambiguity detection: highlights unclear language that could stall progress.
  • Traceability checks: ensures a clear link from each spec requirement to the corresponding plan task.
  • Use Case: Imagine you need to validate a feature plan before kickoff to guarantee all spec directives are addressed.

Quick Start

Review the spec and plan documents to confirm full coverage and identify gaps.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-plan

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate that a software plan fully covers every specification requirement?

To validate specification coverage, you analyze the plan document to ensure every behavioral requirement is mapped to specific plan actions. This requirement coverage validation flags missing or ambiguous items that could derail implementation.

What is traceability checking in software development plans?

Traceability checking ensures a clear link exists from each specification requirement to the corresponding plan task. It verifies that spec behaviors are fully addressed by mapping them directly to implementation actions within the plan document.

How do I detect ambiguities in a feature plan before implementation kickoff?

Detecting ambiguities involves analyzing the plan document to highlight unclear language that could stall progress. This ambiguity detection identifies vague directives within the plan that prevent a clear mapping to specification behaviors.

Can I use this approach to identify blockers to implementation in a project plan?

Yes, you can analyze the generated plan to highlight blockers to implementation. By validating alignment between the specification and plan, the process identifies missing requirements and ambiguous language that would otherwise block progress.

What is the best way to align plans with specs to reduce misinterpretations?

The best way to align plans with specs is to perform a comprehensive review validating that each behavioral requirement is mapped to plan actions. This prevents gaps and misinterpretations by ensuring strict spec-to-plan traceability.

When do I need to review a specification and plan document for coverage gaps?

You need to review specification and plan documents for coverage gaps before feature kickoff. Validating full coverage at this stage guarantees all spec directives are addressed and identifies blockers prior to implementation.