review-plan

Audit project plan files for architectural mistakes and dependency gaps.

30|2|Updated Apr 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hawkyre/hawk-skills --skill review-plan-hawkyre
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-plan
Source: https://github.com/hawkyre/hawk-skills/tree/main/skills/review-plan
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hawkyre/hawk-skills --skill review-plan-hawkyre

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Stress-test a plan file before committing to implementation. Catches architectural mistakes, convention violations, and missing dependencies while changes are still cheap. Invoked directly, not routed from coding-process.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Validate plan integrity against architectural coherence and dependency requirements.
  • Detect missing increments, gaps in sequencing, and convention violations early.
  • Provide structured feedback with MUST FIX / SHOULD FIX / CONSIDER sections to guide fixes.

Quick Start

Run a plan review on your current plan file to surface architectural or dependency issues before coding.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-plan

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate a project plan for architectural mistakes before coding?

To validate a project plan, audit the plan files to catch architectural mistakes, convention violations, and missing dependencies early. This stress-tests plan integrity against dependency requirements before implementation begins.

What is the best way to detect missing increments and sequencing gaps in a plan file?

Detecting missing increments and sequencing gaps requires a structured plan review that checks architectural coherence. This process surfaces sequencing issues and provides feedback categorized into MUST FIX, SHOULD FIX, and CONSIDER sections.

Why does a plan review help with early risk detection in software engineering?

A plan review helps with early risk detection by validating plan increments and dependencies across files while changes are still cheap. It ensures implementability with clear criteria and covers required standards before coding.

Can I use a plan validation tool to check convention violations across multiple plan files?

Yes, you can use plan validation to check convention violations across multiple plan files. It audits project plans to ensure coverage of standards and provides structured feedback to guide necessary fixes.

Does plan review require routing from a coding process to function?

No, plan review does not require routing from a coding process. It is invoked directly to stress-test a plan file independently, ensuring architectural coherence and implementability before committing to implementation.