Validate project plans against a three-layer quality model.
npx skills add https://github.com/whichguy/claude-craft --skill review-plan-whichguy
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: review-plan Source: https://github.com/whichguy/claude-craft/tree/main/skills/review-plan Command: npx skills add https://github.com/whichguy/claude-craft --skill review-plan-whichguy
Plans for software projects are often under-validated, risking integration, testing, and deployment issues. This skill provides a structured, multi-layer review (general quality, code-change quality, and ecosystem considerations) to ensure plans are complete, testable, and safe before implementation.
Submit a plan file to trigger the 3-layer convergence review.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To validate a software project plan, you can run a structured three-layer quality review covering general quality, code-change quality, and ecosystem considerations to ensure testing, deployment, and cross-cutting concerns are fully addressed.
Convergent plan review is a multi-agent evaluation process that checks project plans against a three-layer quality model, using staged reviews and memoization to verify traceable artifacts, explicit assumptions, and clear success criteria.
You can check deployment plan readiness by applying a structured governance evaluation that validates multi-phase plans involving git workflow, testing, deployment, and cross-cutting concerns against traceable artifacts and success criteria.
Yes, you can automate plan evaluation using automation-friendly prompts designed for team leads and evaluators, enabling repeatable governance and rigorous post-implementation workflows for iteration, verification, and risk mitigation.
Plan review works effectively with multi-phase git workflows and deployment pipelines by validating integration and testing safety, ensuring plans are complete, testable, and safe before implementation begins.
Validating plans without ecosystem considerations risks missing integration, testing, and deployment issues, because a complete evaluation requires checking general quality, code-change quality, and ecosystem factors to ensure implementation readiness.
jedmamostoIteratively regenerate plans until external reviewers report no HIGH concerns.
hotaqOrchestrate a strict autonomous loop from planning through implementation and code review.
LinoWhyGuide code writing, review, and refactoring with explicit assumptions and verifiable success criteria.
StudentCristianEvaluate architecture decision records against a predefined critique framework.
