review-pr-comments

Resolves posted Graffiti comments on GitHub pull requests and rewrites them as needed.

14|5|Updated Mar 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/TheCardGoat/lorcana-simulator --skill review-pr-comments-thecardgoat
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-pr-comments
Source: https://github.com/TheCardGoat/lorcana-simulator/tree/main/.agents/skills/review-pr-comments
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/TheCardGoat/lorcana-simulator --skill review-pr-comments-thecardgoat

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It eliminates unanswered GitHub pull request review feedback by turning scattered comments into a sequential, fully verified resolution plan.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Thread-by-thread review resolution: Builds a queue of unresolved review comments and processes each thread sequentially to ensure consistency.
  • Actionable responses and minimal code changes: Answers questions, implements concrete suggestions with the smallest necessary fix, and explains trade-offs for discussion items.
  • End-to-end verification: Runs Bun-based validation (tests, type checks, and lint) after applying changes to ensure the repository remains healthy.
  • Use Case: When reviewers leave multiple comments across several files, you can resolve each thread in order, apply required fixes, and finish with a clear summary of what changed and what verified successfully.

Quick Start

Ask it to review and resolve the specified pull request’s review comments using the repository’s standard checks.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-pr-comments

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automatically resolve unresolved GitHub pull request review comments?

To automatically resolve GitHub pull request review comments, you can process each unresolved thread sequentially by answering questions, applying minimal code changes, and running validation checks. This approach systematically clears scattered feedback end-to-end.

What is the best way to address multiple code review suggestions across different files in a pull request?

Addressing multiple code review suggestions across files requires building a sequential queue of unresolved threads. You classify each comment, implement the smallest necessary fix, and run validation commands from the repository root to ensure repository health.

How does automated pull request feedback resolution handle type checking and linting?

Automated pull request feedback resolution handles type checking and linting by running validation commands from the repository root after applying changes. It executes bun test, bun run check-types, and bun run lint to verify that code updates pass standard checks.

Can I use this approach to resolve PR threads if my repository uses Bun for testing?

Yes, you can resolve PR threads if your repository uses Bun for testing. The workflow specifically executes bun test, bun run check-types, and bun run lint from the repo root to validate any minimal code changes applied during the review resolution process.

What validation steps are required after implementing code changes from pull request review comments?

Required validation steps after implementing code changes from pull request review comments include running bun test, bun run check-types, and bun run lint from the repository root. These checks ensure the updates maintain repository health and pass standard tests.

Does resolving GitHub PR review threads automatically require manual summaries of the changes made?

Resolving GitHub PR review threads automatically does not strictly require manual summaries, but delivering a structured summary of processed items and validation results is recommended. This ensures clarity on what changed and what verified successfully.