skills.rest
corygabrielsen
corygabrielsenCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
𝕏@corygabrielsenGitHub

review-pr

Guide GitHub pull request reviews through a structured, educational workflow.

1|1|Updated Jan 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/corygabrielsen/skills --skill review-pr-corygabrielsen
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-pr
Source: https://github.com/corygabrielsen/skills/tree/main/review-pr
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/corygabrielsen/skills --skill review-pr-corygabrielsen

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured, educational framework for reviewing pull requests, prioritizing understanding and teaching over criticism.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Phase-based review workflow: Gather Context, Understand Before Judging, Identify Issues, Draft Review Collaboratively, Submit.
  • Educational tone and templates: wins, gaps, and actionable recommendations; markdown formatting.
  • Guided interaction: prompts to extract PR metadata, CI status, diffs, related issues, and provide a thorough explanation.

Quick Start

Enter review mode, specify the PR to review, and I will guide you through Phase 1. Then proceed through the remaining phases to produce a complete, teaching-oriented review.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-pr

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct an educational pull request review that teaches developers instead of just criticizing code?▼

An educational pull request review teaches and aligns developers by following a structured, phase-based workflow to gather context, identify issues, and provide collaborative feedback templates for wins and gaps.

What is the best way to structure a GitHub pull request review for software teams?▼

The best way to structure a GitHub pull request review is using a phase-based workflow that extracts PR metadata, CI status, and diffs to draft a teaching-oriented review with actionable recommendations.

How do I write collaborative PR feedback that highlights wins and gaps in markdown?▼

Collaborative PR feedback that highlights wins and gaps uses markdown formatting templates to deliver teach-first messaging, ensuring the review prioritizes understanding and actionable recommendations over criticism.

Can I use a structured PR review workflow to understand code context before judging it?▼

Yes, a structured PR review workflow includes a specific phase to understand code before judging, requiring prompts to extract PR metadata, CI status, diffs, and related issues to guide thorough analysis.

What steps are needed to guide a team through a thorough pull request analysis?▼

Guiding a team through thorough pull request analysis requires completing five phases: Gather Context, Understand Before Judging, Identify Issues, Draft Review Collaboratively, and Submit a teaching-oriented review summary.

Related Skills

TrogonStackTrogonStack
10

gh-enrich-pr-description

Enrich GitHub pull request descriptions by analyzing git history and branch diffs.

Official
Intermediate
ryan-ressmeyerryan-ressmeyer

manuscript-review

Aggregate manuscript critiques into a prioritized revision plan.

Community
Advanced
pradyumnasagarpradyumnasagar
6

agent-handoff

Automate inter-skill data transfer and provenance capture via JSON Material Passports.

Community
Advanced
alangebalangeb

code-review-workflow

Run pyscan, pyanalyze, ruff, and black to generate a unified markdown report.

Community
Intermediate