review-pr

Review pull request diffs against repository canon and security policies.

1|Updated Jul 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/houfu/lq-maintainer-agent --skill review-pr-houfu
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-pr
Source: https://github.com/houfu/lq-maintainer-agent/tree/main/skills/review-pr
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/houfu/lq-maintainer-agent --skill review-pr-houfu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill solves the challenge of maintaining high-quality code standards in large repositories by providing a tiered, automated review process that ensures every contribution is treated with respect and rigor.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Tiered Review Logic: Automatically routes PRs to either a Tier-1 quick pass for small fixes or a Tier-2 deep dive for complex changes.
  • Evidence-Based Reporting: Generates a contributor-friendly reading deck and internal evidence record, ensuring all feedback is grounded in the repository's canon.
  • Use Case: A maintainer can use this to process a complex PR by invoking the review skill, which will then perform a multi-pass analysis, check against security triggers, and draft a professional, actionable response for the contributor.

Quick Start

Run the review-pr skill by providing the pull request number to initiate a tiered analysis of the changes.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-pr

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for pull requests?

Automated code review for pull requests is achieved by performing tiered, evidence-based analysis against repository canon and security policies. The process applies read-only analysis to generate structured, actionable feedback for software maintenance workflows.

How does tiered code review work for GitHub pull requests?

Tiered code review automatically routes pull requests to either a Tier-1 quick pass for small fixes or a Tier-2 deep dive for complex changes. This mechanism ensures appropriate analysis depth based on the diff's characteristics.

What is the best way to perform security vetting on external contributions?

Security vetting for external contributions is best performed through multi-pass analysis that checks diffs against defined security triggers. This approach generates an internal evidence record ensuring all feedback is grounded in repository canon.

Can I use automated triage for software maintenance on complex pull requests?

Yes, automated triage for software maintenance supports complex pull requests by invoking a multi-pass analysis. It checks against security policies and drafts a professional, actionable response for the contributor.

Does automated pull request review modify the repository?

Automated pull request review satisfies requirements for non-destructive, read-only analysis. It does not modify the repository, ensuring safe triage and quality assurance for external contributions.

How to generate actionable feedback for contributors from a pull request diff?

Actionable feedback is generated by analyzing the pull request diff against repository canon to create a contributor-friendly reading deck. This evidence-based reporting ensures all feedback is structured and grounded.