review-pr

Analyze unresolved GitHub PR review comments and apply automated fixes.

1|Updated Feb 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kubrickcode/specvital --skill review-pr-kubrickcode
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-pr
Source: https://github.com/kubrickcode/specvital/tree/main/.claude/skills/review-pr
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kubrickcode/specvital --skill review-pr-kubrickcode

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires gh, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of reviewing GitHub Pull Requests, specifically focusing on identifying and addressing unresolved review comments, ensuring code quality and efficient feedback loops.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Unresolved Comment Analysis: Identifies and analyzes comments that haven't been resolved by the author.
  • Automated Fixes: Applies straightforward fixes directly to the code based on valid review comments.
  • Code Quality Improvement: Ensures adherence to coding standards by addressing style, architecture, and potential bugs.
  • Use Case: When a PR has several outstanding review comments, this Skill can automatically check if the issues are still present, fix simple ones, and flag complex ones for discussion, saving significant reviewer time.

Quick Start

Use the review-pr skill to analyze and address feedback on the pull request at https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-pr

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate fixing unresolved GitHub pull request review comments?

Automating unresolved GitHub pull request review comments involves analyzing feedback via GraphQL and applying fixes for straightforward issues. This Skill checks if coding style, architecture, and bug comments are still present, resolving simple ones automatically while flagging complex design feedback for user input.

How does automated code review handle architectural feedback compared to style issues?

Automated code review applies fixes directly for straightforward issues like coding style and potential bugs. For architectural feedback or design-related comments, it flags the unresolved issues for discussion, requiring user input to resolve complex changes effectively.

Do I need the GitHub CLI to run automated pull request feedback analysis?

Yes, the GitHub CLI is required to run automated pull request feedback analysis. The Skill uses the GitHub CLI and GraphQL to fetch PR data and unresolved comments, ensuring it can accurately identify and address outstanding code review issues.

Can I use automated PR review to address side effects and potential bugs?

Yes, you can use automated PR review to address side effects and potential bugs. The Skill analyzes unresolved comments focusing on these specific code quality areas, applying fixes for identified issues directly to the code to improve overall standards.

What are the limitations of automating pull request comment resolution?

The limitation of automating pull request comment resolution is that it cannot independently fix complex or design-related feedback. It requires user input for these architectural decisions, meaning only straightforward coding style and bug fixes are applied automatically.

What's the best way to streamline PR feedback and fixes on GitHub?

The best way to streamline PR feedback and fixes is to automate the analysis of unresolved review comments using GitHub CLI. This approach applies automated fixes for simple issues and flags complex ones, saving significant reviewer time and ensuring efficient issue resolution.