review-pr

Automated pull request code reviews coordinate specialist agents to check code quality, security vulnerabilities, and correctness, then generate a consolidated report. This process uses local git commands and GitHub APIs to gather diff context and post review summaries directly to GitHub.

Yes, GitHub integration posts review summaries and inline comments directly to GitHub pull requests. The automated code auditing process generates a structured report detailing all findings, deduplicated and ranked by severity, before pushing results to GitHub.

Interactive triage classifies code review findings into Fix, Accept Risk, Defer, or False Positive categories before code changes are applied. This workflow ensures developers manually verify and route issues identified by specialist agents during the security audit.

Yes, automated PR code review requires integration with GitHub APIs and local git commands to perform diff analysis and context gathering. This environment setup allows the specialist agents to accurately review code changes and post comments back to the repository.

Automated code auditing handles duplicate findings by generating a consolidated report that deduplicates issues and ranks them by severity. This structured output ensures developers see a clean list of security and code quality problems without redundant alerts.

You should not use automated code review when you lack local git access or GitHub API integration, as the diff analysis and context gathering depend on these tools. It is also less suitable if your project requires manual, domain-specific correctness checks beyond automated security audits.