review-pr

Evaluate GitHub PR CI status and changed files, then post a structured review summary.

5|1|Updated Dec 12, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ncukondo/reference-manager --skill review-pr-ncukondo
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-pr
Source: https://github.com/ncukondo/reference-manager/tree/main/.claude/skills/review-pr
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ncukondo/reference-manager --skill review-pr-ncukondo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automates GitHub PR reviews by evaluating CI status, inspecting changes, and delivering a concise, actionable assessment to ensure PR quality before merge.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • CI status monitoring: waits for required checks to complete and reports their outcomes.
  • Diff analysis & review guidance: highlights potential issues in changed files and suggests fixes.
  • Automated feedback delivery: posts a structured review summary and actionable recommendations.
  • Use Case: maintainers can run this across multiple PRs to enforce consistent review standards without manual, repetitive checks.

Quick Start

Ask the skill to review PR 123 to run CI checks, analyze changes, and post feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-pr

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate GitHub pull request reviews for CI checks and code diffs?

Automating GitHub pull request reviews involves polling CI status, inspecting file diffs, and delivering structured, actionable feedback. This ensures consistent quality checks across repositories before merging.

What is the best way to monitor CI status and analyze changes across multiple PRs?

The best way to monitor CI status and analyze changes across multiple PRs is using an automated workflow that waits for required checks, evaluates diffs, and posts a concise review summary for maintainers.

Can I use an automated code review tool to enforce consistent quality standards for pull requests?

Yes, you can use an automated code review tool to enforce consistent quality standards by evaluating CI outcomes, inspecting changed files, and posting actionable recommendations without manual, repetitive checks.

How do I get structured, actionable feedback on a GitHub pull request before merging?

To get structured, actionable feedback on a GitHub pull request, automate the review process to highlight potential issues in changed files, suggest fixes, and deliver a concise assessment of the PR quality.

Does automated PR review work with existing GitHub CI checks and workflows?

Yes, automated PR review integrates with existing GitHub CI checks by waiting for required checks to complete, reporting their outcomes, and then inspecting the diff to provide structured review output.

What are the limitations of automating pull request reviews for code changes?

Automating pull request reviews provides deterministic feedback based on CI status and diff inspection, but may not fully replace the contextual judgment required for complex architectural or logic changes.