review-pr

Generate structured pull request reviews with file-by-file analysis and recommendations.

71|88|Updated Nov 8, 2023
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/openshift/lightspeed-service --skill review-pr-openshift
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-pr
Source: https://github.com/openshift/lightspeed-service/tree/main/.cursor/skills/review-pr
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/openshift/lightspeed-service --skill review-pr-openshift

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Streamlines PR reviews by providing a structured, repeatable analysis.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured evaluation across architecture, naming, patterns, and risk questions for PRs.
  • Generates consistent deliverables: summary, file-by-file analysis, and actionable recommendations.
  • Useful for engineering teams reviewing changes in codebases with multiple modules and contributors.

Quick Start

Invoke the PR review workflow for the target pull request to generate a standardized critique and actionable recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-pr

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a structured pull request review for code changes across endpoints and models?

A structured pull request review evaluates code changes by guiding reviewers through architecture, naming, patterns, and risk questions. It enforces a fixed review structure and includes an issues table verification workflow to ensure comprehensive analysis.

What is the best way to standardize PR reviews for engineering teams with multiple contributors?

Standardizing PR reviews for engineering teams involves enforcing a fixed review structure that generates consistent deliverables, including a summary, file-by-file analysis, and actionable recommendations for every pull request.

Can I use a repeatable PR review process to verify an issues table in a pull request?

Yes, a repeatable PR review process includes an issues table verification workflow to systematically check tracked issues. This ensures quality assurance by validating that reported problems are addressed during the code review.

Does automated code review work with utility modules and different codebase patterns?

Automated code review is applicable to code changes across endpoints, models, and utilities. It evaluates changes by guiding the reviewer through architecture, naming conventions, and established code patterns specific to those modules.

What deliverables should I expect from a structured code review workflow?

A structured code review workflow outputs a standardized review document containing a high-level summary, detailed file-by-file analysis, and actionable recommendations. This ensures repeatable quality assurance and clear communication of necessary changes.