review-pr

Fetch PR details, analyze code with Codex, and generate priority-classified feedback.

1|Updated Jun 8, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ryosukesuto/dotfiles --skill review-pr-ryosukesuto
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-pr
Source: https://github.com/ryosukesuto/dotfiles/tree/main/config/claude/skills/review-pr
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ryosukesuto/dotfiles --skill review-pr-ryosukesuto

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of systematically reviewing Pull Requests, providing structured, actionable feedback to improve code quality and reduce review time.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Analysis: Leverages AI (Codex) to analyze code diffs, identify potential issues, and classify them by priority.
  • Structured Feedback: Generates reviews in a standardized format, including priority-based issue classification, suggested fixes, and overall assessment.
  • Use Case: When a developer submits a Pull Request, this Skill can be invoked to provide an initial, comprehensive review, flagging critical issues (P0) and suggesting improvements (P1-P3), allowing human reviewers to focus on higher-level concerns.

Quick Start

Use the review-pr skill to systematically review the current pull request and provide actionable feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-pr

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for a pull request?

Automated code review for a pull request fetches PR details, uses AI to analyze code diffs, and generates structured feedback. It classifies issues by priority from P0 to P3 to flag critical problems and suggest improvements.

What is AI-driven pull request analysis and how does it work?

AI-driven pull request analysis leverages Codex to systematically evaluate code diffs. It identifies potential issues, validates findings against project context, and outputs structured feedback with priority classifications.

Can I use an AI assistant to identify security vulnerabilities in my code diffs?

Yes, using an AI assistant to review code diffs can identify security vulnerabilities. It validates findings against project-specific context and best practices, ensuring code quality before human review.

What is the best way to provide structured feedback on code quality?

The best way to provide structured feedback on code quality is to classify issues by priority (P0-P3) and suggest fixes. This approach allows human reviewers to focus on higher-level concerns instead of manual issue detection.

Does automated PR review require specific project context to be effective?

Automated PR review requires project-specific context to be effective. The AI analysis uses this context to validate findings and suggest improvements based on best practices relevant to your codebase.

When should I avoid using AI for pull request reviews?

You should avoid relying solely on AI for pull request reviews when addressing high-level architectural concerns. AI is best used for initial, comprehensive reviews to flag critical issues, while humans handle complex logic.