skills.rest
shawnpetros
shawnpetrosCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

review-pr

Fetch pull request metadata and diffs, then evaluate correctness and quality.

1|Updated Apr 24, 2026
Search Tags:#diff analysis#code review#GitHub PR#inline comments#correctness checks#delta re-review#authorship signals
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpetros/claude-skills --skill review-pr-shawnpetros
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-pr
Source: https://github.com/shawnpetros/claude-skills/tree/main/review-pr
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpetros/claude-skills --skill review-pr-shawnpetros

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It eliminates slow, inconsistent pull request reviews by turning a PR reference into a structured, evidence-based review with inline comments and a clear summary in your voice.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • PR fetch + full diff review: Retrieves PR metadata and the complete diff, then evaluates changes file-by-file.
  • Authorship signal aware tone: Adjusts scrutiny based on signals like AI-assisted commit patterns versus human-written changes.
  • Correctness-focused feedback: Highlights what shines, flags correctness risks, and avoids preference-only nitpicks.
  • Delta-aware re-review: On re-review requests, compares only the delta from the prior review to avoid repeating noise.

Quick Start

Ask Claude Code to review a PR like owner/repo#123, and it will fetch the diff, identify strengths and potential issues, and post inline comments plus a summary.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-pr

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get fast inline comments for a GitHub PR review?▼

A GitHub PR review tool fetches metadata and the complete diff, evaluates changes file-by-file, and posts inline comments plus a summary. It highlights what shines, flags correctness risks, and avoids preference-only nitpicks.

How does delta-aware re-review work after the author responds to PR comments?▼

Delta-aware re-review compares only the code changes made since the prior review request, preventing repeated noise. It targets the updated diff to provide fresh, constructive feedback without rehashing old comments.

Can I use automated code review for AI-assisted commits versus human-written changes?▼

Yes, the review process adjusts its scrutiny based on authorship signals, evaluating AI-assisted commit patterns differently than human-written changes. It enforces safety thresholds by aborting without public comments when serious issues are detected.

What is the best way to enforce correctness checks during a pull request diff analysis?▼

The best way to enforce correctness checks is to use an automated review tool that scores feedback internally to choose approve or request changes outcomes. It aborts without public comments when serious issues are detected during the diff analysis.

Does automated PR review post public comments when serious correctness issues are detected?▼

No, it enforces clear safety thresholds by aborting without public comments when serious issues are detected. It scores feedback internally to choose approve versus request changes outcomes, ensuring only constructive feedback is posted.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
magic3007magic3007
10

analyze-pr

Parse GitHub or GitLab PR URLs and generate analysis documents.

Community
Advanced
man-groupman-group
2.5k

review-pr

Review ArcticDB pull requests and post deduplicated inline comments.

Official
Advanced
AgentsMeshAgentsMesh
2.3k

merge

Merge a Git branch into a target with MR creation and pipeline monitoring.

Official
Intermediate
insightwavesmithinsightwavesmith

code-analyzer

Analyze code changes to identify those meeting evidence-shape-check criteria.

Community
Intermediate