review-pr

Reviews pull requests using specialized reviewer personas with cross-review and debate.

Updated Jul 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/usmangurowa/socialmocks --skill review-pr-usmangurowa
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-pr
Source: https://github.com/usmangurowa/socialmocks/tree/main/.agents/skills/review-pr
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/usmangurowa/socialmocks --skill review-pr-usmangurowa

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Pull request reviews are often shallow, inconsistent, or bottlenecked on a single reviewer's perspective. This Skill orchestrates a team of specialized reviewer personas that examine a PR from architecture, code quality, testing, security, and product angles, then debate findings before delivering a unified review. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-Persona Review: Specialized reviewers (Architecture Skeptic, Code Quality, Test, Security & Reliability, Product) each evaluate the PR through their own lens. - Portable Orchestration: Runs in parallel when the runtime supports multi-agent orchestration (Claude Code teams, Codex sub-agents, opencode subagents), or falls back to sequential lead-mediated passes. - Cross-Review and Debate: Findings are challenged and validated across reviewers before being folded into a single human-readable summary. - Use Case: Before merging a feature branch, invoke this Skill to get an end-to-end review covering correctness, edge cases, test coverage, UX impact, and whether the PR solves the right problem. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to review the current pull request using the review-pr skill and produce a unified review summary.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-pr

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a multi-agent code review on a pull request?

Invoke the review-pr skill on your pull request and it dispatches specialized reviewer personas in parallel when the runtime supports multi-agent orchestration. Otherwise the lead reviewer runs the same roles sequentially and merges the findings.

What reviewer perspectives does an AI PR review cover?

The review covers architecture soundness, code quality, test coverage of critical logic, security and reliability concerns, and product/UX impact. Each persona applies its own lens and findings are debated before the final summary.

Does this PR review work without multi-agent support?

Yes. When the runtime lacks multi-agent orchestration, the lead runs each reviewer role as lead-mediated subagent jobs or sequential passes, producing the same cross-reviewed output.

Which AI coding tools can orchestrate this PR review?

The skill supports Claude Code teams, Codex sub-agents, and opencode subagents for parallel orchestration, with a sequential fallback for other runtimes.

When should I not use a team-based PR review?

Avoid it for trivial changes like typo fixes where a full multi-persona review adds overhead without value. It is designed for PRs where correctness, edge cases, and design decisions genuinely matter.