review-process

To conduct a CRISP-DM phase review, audit project artifacts from phases 1 through 4 to surface process-quality insights, cross-phase consistency, and overlooked factors. This generates a structured health verdict and a formal 5.2 review document to guide deployment decisions.

Checking cross-phase consistency involves auditing alignment between business objectives, data understanding, preparation, modeling, and evaluation. The review process evaluates these programmatic audits to ensure methodology gaps are identified before final deployment.

Generating a model governance artifact audit produces a formal 5.2 review document at docs/crisp-dm/5-evaluation/5.2-review-process.md and an accompanying notebook. It evaluates execution quality and outputs recommended actions for production readiness.

A process review is needed during phase 1 through 4 evaluations to conduct structured retrospectives. It identifies overlooked factors, generates actionable lessons learned, and provides a structured health verdict before making final deployment decisions.

Yes, you can programmatically audit CRISP-DM documentation using a generated notebook at notebooks/5.2-review-process.ipynb. It integrates with existing docs to identify overlooked factors and surface methodology gaps across data science engagements.