review-proto

You can validate protobuf API contract changes in a pull request by auditing proto files against a predefined checklist of best practices. This process checks syntax, package naming, field validation annotations, and RPC method signatures for correctness.

Enforcing proto-only changes in a pull request involves verifying the PR scope to ensure it lacks unintended SQL or Go code modifications. This scope enforcement prevents unrelated files from altering the API contract unexpectedly.

To check buf.yaml configuration during a proto review, you validate the file for correct versioning and dependencies. This ensures the protocol buffer build environment aligns with project-specific requirements before merging API changes.

Yes, the protobuf review process validates service and model proto files separately. It audits specific files like `_model.proto`, `_refs.proto`, and `_service.proto` against a comprehensive checklist to ensure API contract correctness.

You can automate API contract auditing for protobuf pull requests by running a script that checks proto definitions. This automated checklist audit verifies models, references, and services to prevent integration issues and maintain API integrity.

During an automated API contract review, protobuf standards checked include syntax correctness, package naming conventions, field validation annotations, and RPC method signatures. These checks ensure proto definitions adhere to established project-specific requirements.