review-quality-evaluator

Evaluate CodeBuddy review packets against third-party review quality bars.

4|1|Updated Feb 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/danielbaustin/agent-design-language --skill review-quality-evaluator
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-quality-evaluator
Source: https://github.com/danielbaustin/agent-design-language/tree/main/adl/tools/skills/review-quality-evaluator
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/danielbaustin/agent-design-language --skill review-quality-evaluator

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Evaluate CodeBuddy review packets and reports against the third-party-review quality bar for evidence quality, severity accuracy, actionability, duplication, unsupported claims, specialist coverage, template compliance, residual risk clarity, and publication safety before customer-facing use.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Gate internal review artifacts to ensure evidence-driven findings, proper template structure, and redaction readiness.
  • Assess specialist coverage, residual risks, and publication boundaries to prevent unsafe customer-facing outputs.
  • Generate structured quality artifacts (JSON and Markdown) for handoffs, audits, and governance.

Quick Start

Execute the evaluation against a CodeBuddy packet root to produce a quality-evaluation artifact.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-quality-evaluator

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate CodeBuddy review packets against a quality bar before publication?

Gate CodeBuddy review packets by validating evidence quality, severity justification, and actionability. The evaluation checks specialist coverage, template compliance, and residual risk clarity to ensure publication safety before customer exposure.

What does a code review quality gate check for in internal review artifacts?

A code review quality gate checks internal review artifacts for evidence-driven findings, proper template structure, and redaction readiness. It verifies unsupported claims, duplication, and specialist coverage to prevent unsafe customer-facing outputs.

How do I generate structured quality artifacts for audit and governance handoffs?

Generate structured quality artifacts in JSON and Markdown formats by executing an evaluation against a CodeBuddy packet root. These artifacts document residual risk clarity and template compliance for audits and governance handoffs.

Do I need a structured input policy to validate redaction readiness in code reviews?

Yes, validating redaction readiness requires a structured input policy to gate review artifacts. Optional specialist artifacts validate findings, template sections, and residual risk before customer exposure.

When should I assess residual risk and publication boundaries in review workflows?

Assess residual risk and publication boundaries in review workflows before customer-facing use. This prevents unsafe outputs by verifying evidence quality, severity accuracy, and specialist coverage meet the trusted review quality bar.