review

Analyze PR diffs for SQL safety, LLM trust boundaries, and conditional side effects.

Updated Apr 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rahmanayon/beehive --skill review-rahmanayon
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/rahmanayon/beehive/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rahmanayon/beehive --skill review-rahmanayon

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Diff-heavy PRs can introduce SQL safety issues, trust boundary violations in LLM outputs, and subtle structural problems that slip past tests. This Skill provides a focused pre-landing PR review by analyzing the diff against the base branch and surfacing actionable issues.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Analyze diffs for SQL safety, LLM trust boundaries, and conditional side effects, then surface actionable fixes.
  • Proactively suggest when changes may violate governance or risk policies before merging.
  • Guide routing and telemetry decisions during reviews to align with project standards.

Quick Start

Run the review workflow on a pull request or diff using /review to surface issues and recommended actions.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate PR reviews for SQL safety and LLM trust boundary violations?

You can automate PR reviews by analyzing code diffs against the base branch to detect SQL safety issues, LLM trust boundary violations, and conditional side effects. Running the review workflow surfaces actionable risks and recommended fixes before merging code changes.

What is a pre-landing PR review and when do I need it?

A pre-landing PR review analyzes pull request diffs before merging to identify SQL safety issues, LLM trust boundary violations, and conditional side effects. You need it when diff-heavy changes risk introducing subtle structural problems that might slip past standard automated tests.

How do I check pull request diffs for conditional side effects before merging?

To check pull request diffs for conditional side effects, run a diff analysis workflow that compares changes against the base branch. This surfaces subtle structural risks and governance or policy violations, providing actionable recommendations before the code lands.

Can I use automated code review for routing and telemetry prompt validation?

Yes, automated code review can guide routing and telemetry decisions during pull request analysis. The workflow evaluates diffs to ensure changes align with project standards, satisfying routing prompts, proactive suggestions, and plan-mode interactions through tool-enabled workflows.

Does this code review workflow work with base-branch comparisons?

Yes, the code review workflow specifically applies to base-branch comparisons by analyzing pull request diffs. It surfaces risks related to SQL safety, LLM trust boundaries, and conditional side effects across the changes detected between the feature branch and base.

What are the limitations of automated diff analysis for LLM trust boundaries?

Automated diff analysis focuses on detecting LLM trust boundary violations, SQL safety issues, and conditional side effects in pull request diffs. It serves as a pre-landing review to surface risks, but may not catch every nuanced logic error beyond its targeted analysis scope.