skills.rest
techygarg
techygargCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

review-refiner

Generate a formal review-standards document via a guided interview workflow.

176|13|Updated Mar 2, 2026
Search Tags:#workflow#configuration#standards#interview#lattice#molecule#review-refiner
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/techygarg/lattice --skill review-refiner
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-refiner
Source: https://github.com/techygarg/lattice/tree/main/plugins/lattice/skills/review-refiner
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/techygarg/lattice --skill review-refiner

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Structured conversation to customize how the review molecule loads atoms, classifies severity, formats reports, and manages scope, so teams can generate a formal review-standards document.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Guided interview flow to configure atom loading, severity classification, report formatting, scope rules, insight capture, and health logging.
  • Produces a .lattice/standards/review-standards.md file that drives future reviews by the molecule.
  • Use cases include defining project-specific defaults, enabling overlay or override modes, and adding custom review dimensions.

Quick Start

Begin a guided interview to customize how the review molecule loads atoms, classifies findings, and formats reports to produce the standards document.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-refiner

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I configure a formal code review standards document for my project?▼

To configure a formal review standards document, you complete a guided interview covering atom loading, severity classification, report formatting, and scope rules. This generates a .lattice/standards/review-standards.md file to drive future reviews.

What is the process for setting severity classification and scope rules in a review workflow?▼

Setting severity classification and scope rules involves a guided interview that establishes project-specific defaults for your review workflow. The configured settings are then captured in a formal review-standards document.

Can I define an overlay or override mode for my review workflow configuration?▼

Yes, you can define overlay or override modes for your review workflow configuration. The guided interview process enables these modes and adds custom review dimensions within the generated standards document.

How do I customize atom loading and report formatting for code reviews?▼

You customize atom loading and report formatting by answering interview questions about your project requirements. The responses produce a review-standards.md file that dictates how the review molecule loads atoms and formats reports.

Does a guided interview workflow help generate project-specific review standards?▼

A guided interview workflow helps generate project-specific review standards by walking you through configuration steps for health logging and insight capture. The output is a formal document satisfying overlay or override workflow requirements.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
normcrandallnormcrandall
1

coding-standards

Analyze project configurations and code patterns to generate coding-standards.md.

Community
Basic
babywormbabyworm
43

code-review-policy

Classify LLM-generated code review findings into severity-labeled reports with reproducible evidence.

Community
Intermediate
techygargtechygarg
176

ddd-refiner

Guide teams to define DDD guardrails and generate a ddd-principles.md document.

Community
Advanced
kriegcloudkriegcloud
68

writing-laws

Generate formal codebase laws with hierarchical numbering and mandatory modal verbs.

Community
Advanced