review

Audits drafts and papers for evidence-grounded critique and produces a revision plan.

3.3k|331|Updated Sep 26, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ResearAI/DeepScientist --skill review-researai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/ResearAI/DeepScientist/tree/main/src/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ResearAI/DeepScientist --skill review-researai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Reviewers need a rigorous, independent audit of substantial drafts or paper-like reports before finalization, rebuttal, or revision routing.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Independent, skeptical audit of narrative and supporting evidence.
  • Identification of core claims and evidence gaps, assessment of novelty, and a concrete revision plan.
  • Route to next steps: write, analysis-campaign, baseline, scout, or decision.

Quick Start

Provide a rigorous critique of the current draft and generate a concrete revision plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit a manuscript draft before journal submission?

A manuscript audit evaluates narrative support and evidence gaps to produce a durable review artifact, a revision plan, and explicit routing to downstream skills for finalization.

What is a skeptical paper review and how does it work?

A skeptical paper review independently critiques narrative and supporting evidence to identify core claims, assess novelty, and ensure defensible conclusions before generating a revision plan.

How do I create a concrete revision plan for a research paper?

Generate a revision plan by auditing the draft to identify evidence gaps and core claims, then producing a structured plan with explicit next-step routing to downstream skills like write or analysis-campaign.

Does this independent draft critique work for substantial manuscripts?

Yes, this independent draft critique is designed for substantial manuscripts needing a rigorous gate before submission or revision, providing a durable review artifact and explicit next-step routing.

What is the best way to identify evidence gaps in a manuscript?

The best way to identify evidence gaps is running an independent, skeptical audit that evaluates supporting evidence against core claims and outputs a durable review artifact with a revision plan.

When do I need a draft audit before revision routing?

You need a draft audit when a substantial manuscript requires a rigorous gate to ensure defensible conclusions, yielding a revision plan and explicit routing to downstream skills.