skills.rest
stacklok
stacklokOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
Website𝕏@StackLokHQGitHub

review-rfc

Review RFCs for completeness, architectural alignment, and security.

3|2|Updated Jan 9, 2026
Search Tags:#architecture#security#governance#review#RFC#ToolHive
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/stacklok/toolhive-rfcs --skill review-rfc
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-rfc
Source: https://github.com/stacklok/toolhive-rfcs/tree/main/.claude/skills/review-rfc
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/stacklok/toolhive-rfcs --skill review-rfc

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables teams to thoroughly review RFCs for the ToolHive ecosystem, ensuring proposals meet quality, architectural coherence, and security standards before implementation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive RFC critique: Evaluate completeness, technical accuracy, and alignment with ToolHive architecture.
  • Context gathering: Collect relevant context from ToolHive docs and related RFCs to inform decisions.
  • Decision readiness: Provide actionable feedback to accelerate RFC reviews and approvals.

Quick Start

Load an RFC file path (e.g., rfcs/0001-example.md) and initiate a structured review to generate consolidated feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-rfc

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review an RFC for architecture and security completeness?▼

RFC review for ToolHive assesses completeness, architectural alignment, and security considerations. It enforces a structured critique to provide clear implementation, testing, and risk mitigation guidance for proposals.

How do I evaluate if a ToolHive proposal meets governance standards?▼

You can evaluate ToolHive proposals by applying a structured RFC review that assesses completeness, technical accuracy, and alignment with ToolHive architecture. This process gathers relevant context to inform decisions and provide actionable feedback.

Can I use a structured review process to check RFC alignment with ToolHive architecture?▼

Yes, a structured RFC review assesses alignment with ToolHive architecture by identifying and critiquing proposals. It enforces a structured evaluation of completeness, architectural alignment, and security considerations to ensure quality.

What's the best way to generate actionable feedback on a design RFC?▼

The best way to generate actionable feedback is to load the RFC file path and initiate a structured review. This process evaluates completeness and technical accuracy, providing actionable feedback to accelerate RFC reviews and approvals.

Do I need context from related RFCs to assess decision readiness?▼

Yes, context gathering collects relevant information from ToolHive docs and related RFCs to inform decisions. This ensures the review provides actionable feedback to accelerate RFC reviews and approvals for decision readiness.

Why does my RFC review need implementation and risk mitigation guidance?▼

An RFC review needs implementation and risk mitigation guidance to ensure proposals meet quality, architectural coherence, and security standards before implementation. This structured approach enforces clear testing and risk mitigation guidance.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
stacklokstacklok
3

write-rfc

Draft RFC documents using the THV template for ToolHive repositories.

Official
Basic
MicrockMicrock
322

kiro-skill

Generate EARS-format feature specs, design documents, and implementation task lists.

Community
Advanced
yutaro0915yutaro0915

cdd-review-decision

Validate DECIDED design decisions for alignment with architecture and related documents before implementation.

Community
Advanced
v1bh0rv1bh0r

nw-security-by-design

Apply STRIDE threat modeling and OWASP mitigations to architecture design reviews.

Community
Advanced