review-rfc

To review an RFC document, submit the text to receive automated checks for header completeness, section structure, cross-references, formatting, and content quality before GitHub submission.

RFC lifecycle status-aware guidance adapts automated quality checks based on the current status of the RFC, ensuring formatting, structure, and policy conformance rules align with each lifecycle phase.

Yes, the RFC review process validates cross-references and header completeness, evaluating formatting and content quality according to lifecycle rules to guide necessary edits and issue creation.

You can use automated checks to prepare Incan RFCs across all statuses, guiding edits, issue creation, and cross-reference validation to ensure policy conformance prior to GitHub submission.

The best way to identify content quality issues is to submit the RFC document for review, receiving a structured critique that evaluates formatting, structure, and policy conformance according to lifecycle rules.

RFC review fails when section structure or formatting issues are detected, triggering automated checks that evaluate header completeness, cross-references, and content quality to guide required edits and issue creation.