review

Review code across correctness, security, architecture, readability, and performance.

Updated May 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/santanapol/agent-skills --skill review-santanapol
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/santanapol/agent-skills/tree/main/.cursor/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/santanapol/agent-skills --skill review-santanapol

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Manual code reviews often miss critical issues across correctness, security, and architecture, leading to buggy code, security vulnerabilities, and technical debt that slows down development and increases risk before merge.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 5-Axis Review Coverage: Evaluates code across Correctness, Readability, Architecture, Security, and Performance to catch all types of issues, including edge cases and compliance gaps.
  • Structured Issue Reporting: Categorizes all findings as Critical, Important, or Suggestion, with exact file:line locations and actionable fix recommendations for each issue.
  • Standards Alignment: Automatically validates code against domain-specific coding standards for Backend, Auth, Frontend (Backoffice), and Gateway projects to ensure consistency.
  • Use Case: Use this skill when preparing a pull request for merge to ensure no critical bugs, security flaws, or architectural issues slip through, and that all code adheres to your team's defined standards.

Quick Start

Request a 5-axis code review of your current staged or recent commit changes to get a structured list of issues with exact file locations and fix recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a pre-merge pull request review to catch security and architecture issues?

A pre-merge code review audits staged or recent commits across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance to identify critical issues and generate structured findings with exact file:line locations before merge.

Can I enforce domain-specific coding standards for backend and frontend codebases during a code review?

You can enforce domain-specific coding standards for backend, auth, frontend, and gateway projects during a code review to automatically validate code consistency and compliance across different codebases.

What is the best way to audit recent commits for security vulnerabilities and performance issues?

Auditing recent commits requires evaluating code across security and performance axes to identify vulnerabilities and bottlenecks, categorizing findings by severity with actionable fix recommendations.

Does the code review process provide exact file locations and fix suggestions for identified issues?

The code review process provides structured issue reporting that categorizes all findings as Critical, Important, or Suggestion, complete with exact file:line locations and actionable fix recommendations for each issue.

What are the limitations of using a 5-axis code review for pull requests?

A 5-axis code review focuses on correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance for backend, frontend, auth, and gateway codebases, meaning it may not cover specialized domains outside these stated project types.