skills.rest
conn-castle
conn-castleOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

review-scope

Audit repository changes and file sets to produce a findings report.

9|1|Updated Jan 8, 2026
Search Tags:#audit#review#code-review#diffs#uncommitted-changes#findings#hotspot
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/conn-castle/agent-layer --skill review-scope-conn-castle
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-scope
Source: https://github.com/conn-castle/agent-layer/tree/main/internal/templates/skills/review-scope
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/conn-castle/agent-layer --skill review-scope-conn-castle

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Streamlines targeted reviews of code changes and repo slices to surface correctness, architecture, and maintainability issues before deployment.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Correctness review of explicit plan artifacts or diffs
  • Proactive hotspot audits to identify high-risk areas
  • Precise target selection for unstaged changes, staged changes, or specific file sets
  • Multi-agent review lenses (Correctness, Architecture, Quality, Maintainer) to surface diverse risks
  • Evidence-backed findings with an auditable report

Quick Start

Run the review-scope skill against the current repository to generate a findings report

Frequently Asked Questions about review-scope

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review uncommitted changes for correctness and architecture issues?▼

You can review uncommitted changes by running an audit against staged or unstaged diffs to produce a structured findings report. It applies Correctness, Architecture, Quality, and Maintainer review lenses to surface diverse risks.

How do I conduct a proactive hotspot audit on specific file sets?▼

Proactive hotspot audits target specific file sets to surface correctness and maintainability issues. The audit identifies high-risk areas and outputs an evidence-backed findings report suitable for per-repo review.

What is the best way to generate an evidence-backed codebase review report?▼

Generating an evidence-backed codebase review report requires auditing repository changes or targeted file sets. It evaluates diffs and explicit plan artifacts to produce structured findings with auditable conclusions.

Can I review explicit plan artifacts against actual code diffs?▼

Yes, you can apply a correctness review to explicit plan artifacts and code diffs. The audit evaluates these targets to surface discrepancies and issues before deployment.

Does the code review process support both staged and unstaged changes?▼

The code review process supports precise target selection for both staged and unstaged changes. It audits these repository changes to identify correctness, architecture, and maintainability issues.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
avoidthekitchenavoidthekitchen
1

code-review

Review source files and git diffs for logic, security, and maintainability issues.

Community
Intermediate
jolequesjoleques

governance-revisor

Grade operational risks in deployment changes and output a structured report.

Community
Advanced
mkusakamkusaka
7

code-review-phase-0-gather-the-diff

Retrieve unified diffs from git repositories for code review.

Community
Basic
webdevtodayjasonwebdevtodayjason

requesting-code-review

Review code quality with static analysis and security scans before commits.

Community
Advanced