review-scoring

Score code reviews across 10 dimensions with weighted criteria and deterministic markdown validation.

6|3|Updated Jan 2, 2026

Search Tags:#quality assurance #code review #validation #protocol #scoring rubric #wrfc

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/mgd34msu/goodvibes-plugin --skill review-scoring

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-scoring
Source: https://github.com/mgd34msu/goodvibes-plugin/tree/main/plugins/goodvibes/skills/protocol/review-scoring
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mgd34msu/goodvibes-plugin --skill review-scoring

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill standardizes code review by providing a quantifiable scoring rubric and a strict output format, ensuring consistent quality evaluation and deterministic validation of review outcomes.

Core Features & Use Cases

Quantified Scoring: Evaluates code across 10 dimensions (Correctness, Completeness, Security, etc.) on a 1-10 scale, with weighted averages for an overall score.
Structured Review Format: Mandates a specific Markdown output for reviews, including dimension scores, issue categorization (Critical, Major, Minor), and actionable fix suggestions with file:line references.
Deterministic Validation: Includes validation scripts to ensure reviews and fix reports adhere to the defined format and requirements.
Use Case: Integrate this Skill into your CI/CD pipeline to automatically score code reviews, flag critical issues, and ensure all feedback is actionable and consistently formatted, leading to higher code quality and faster iteration cycles.

Quick Start

Use the review-scoring skill to validate the format of a given code review markdown document.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-scoring

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I standardize code review quality with a quantified scoring rubric?▼

You can standardize code review quality by applying a quantified scoring rubric that evaluates code across 10 dimensions on a 1-10 scale. This enforces consistent quality evaluation and deterministic validation of review outcomes through structured markdown formatting.

Can I automate code review scoring in my CI/CD pipeline?▼

Yes, you can integrate code review scoring into your CI/CD pipeline to automatically score reviews, flag critical issues, and ensure feedback is actionable and consistently formatted. This leads to higher code quality and faster iteration cycles.

What dimensions are evaluated in a weighted code quality scoring rubric?▼

A weighted code quality scoring rubric evaluates code across 10 dimensions including Correctness, Completeness, and Security, each scored on a 1-10 scale. Weighted averages calculate an overall score with specific pass/fail thresholds.

How do I format code review feedback for deterministic validation?▼

Format code review feedback using specific structured markdown that includes dimension scores, issue categorization by Critical, Major, or Minor severity, and actionable fix suggestions with file:line references. Validation scripts ensure reports adhere to these requirements.

What is the WRFC loop process for code review and re-review?▼

The WRFC loop process for code review enforces deterministic validation of review outputs through structured markdown and specific issue categorization. It includes requirements for fix agent documentation and structured re-review processes to ensure quality thresholds are met.

Does review-scoring work without external dependencies?▼

Yes, review-scoring operates without external dependencies, using included scripts and references to validate markdown format and scoring criteria. It enforces deterministic validation entirely through its internal rubric and structured formatting rules.