review

Verify code changes against ADRs by analyzing architectural alignment to identify missing decisions and ensure traceable, compliant codebase modifications. This review process produces a formal document indicating approval status and actionable next steps.

A structured code review workflow assesses architectural decisions, test coverage, and security controls to produce a concise, actionable review document. It guides log collection, formal evaluation, and approval status tracking across the codebase.

Generate a formal review document by initializing an architecture analysis that evaluates ADR compliance, test coverage, and security considerations. The resulting artifact provides standardized status reporting and actionable next steps.

Yes, you can assess test coverage and security risks during an architecture review by evaluating potential risk areas and security controls. The analysis identifies gaps and outputs actionable recommendations within the review document.

You need an ADR compliance check when changes require architecture-fit analysis, traceable decisions, or security verification across codebases. It ensures modifications align with documented architectural standards before formal approval.

Outline actionable next steps by evaluating code quality, ADR alignment, and security checks to produce a standardized review artifact. This formal document guides decision-making and tracks the formal approval status of changes.