review-security-issue

Review GitHub issues for security implications and label remediation status.

Updated Apr 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/x402agent/openclawd-stack --skill review-security-issue
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-security-issue
Source: https://github.com/x402agent/openclawd-stack/tree/main/openclawd-stack/OpenShell-main/.agents/skills/review-security-issue
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/x402agent/openclawd-stack --skill review-security-issue

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates security issue reviews by evaluating GitHub issues for genuine security concerns and determining appropriate remediation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Marker-guided workflow for agent comments and review status
  • Stepwise analysis of issue content with a sub-agent
  • Remediation guidance and state transition to state:review-ready

Quick Start

Trigger a security review for a GitHub issue to start the end-to-end analysis and reporting workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-security-issue

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate security reviews for GitHub issues?

Automating security reviews for GitHub issues involves fetching issues via the gh CLI, analyzing content with a sub-agent, posting structured comments, and applying the state:review-ready label to guide remediation.

What is a structured security review for GitHub issues?

A structured security review evaluates GitHub issue claims to determine if a legitimate security risk exists, using label checks, agent-marker verification, and sub-agent analysis before posting remediation guidance.

Do I need the gh CLI to review GitHub security issues?

Yes, the gh CLI is required to fetch GitHub issues for the security review workflow, which then uses an automated sub-agent to analyze the issue content and post remediation comments.

How does an automated agent determine if a security issue claim is legitimate?

An automated agent determines legitimacy by applying marker-guided workflows, verifying labels, and running stepwise analysis via a principal-engineer-reviewer sub-agent to evaluate the security risk claim.

What happens after a GitHub security issue is reviewed?

After a GitHub security issue is reviewed, the workflow posts structured remediation comments to the issue and updates its state by applying the state:review-ready label for further action.

Can I use this to review any GitHub issue for security risks?

Yes, this security review process applies to any GitHub issue with a potential security risk, evaluating the claim and guiding the reviewer through verification and remediation steps.