skills.rest
shusuke-ioku
shusuke-iokuCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

review

Orchestrates three independent reviewer roles to generate a consolidated decision and editor report.

Updated Mar 22, 2026
Search Tags:#methodology#review#editorial#literature#peer-review#case-expert#editor-report
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/shusuke-ioku/r2 --skill review-shusuke-ioku
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/shusuke-ioku/r2/tree/main/src/r2/template/.claude/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/shusuke-ioku/r2 --skill review-shusuke-ioku

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Simulates the editorial review process by orchestrating three expert subagents (Literature Scholar, Methodologist, and Case/Domain Expert), collecting their reports, and producing a consolidated decision.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Orchestrates parallel reviewer roles to accelerate manuscript evaluation.
  • Generates structured reviewer reports and a synthesized Editor Report following the provided templates.
  • Supports scenario planning with the NVI framework and a revision roadmap for resubmission.

Quick Start

Trigger the workflow by saying 'review the paper' to launch the three-reviewer process.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I simulate a peer-review process for my manuscript?▼

To simulate a peer-review process, this Skill deploys three independent expert reviewers—a Literature Scholar, Methodologist, and Case/Domain Expert—to evaluate your manuscript and generate a consolidated Editor Report.

What is the NVI framework for editorial review?▼

The NVI framework is an assessment model used during editorial review to evaluate a manuscript's novelty, validity, and importance, which ultimately guides the final consolidated decision and revision planning.

How do I start a triple-review workflow for an academic paper?▼

You start the triple-review workflow by providing your target manuscript and triggering the Skill with a command like 'review the paper', which launches parallel reviews from three specialized subagents.

Can I get structured reviewer reports and a revision roadmap for my paper?▼

Yes, the workflow collects parallel reviewer reports from the three expert subagents and synthesizes them into a structured Editor Report that includes a revision roadmap for resubmission planning.

Does the simulated editorial review assess research methodology and literature gaps?▼

Yes, the simulated editorial review includes a dedicated Methodologist subagent to evaluate research methodology and a Literature Scholar to identify gaps, ensuring comprehensive manuscript assessment.

What is the difference between this triple-review simulation and a standard peer review?▼

This triple-review simulation accelerates manuscript evaluation by orchestrating three parallel expert roles simultaneously—literature, methodology, and domain—rather than relying on a single sequential review path.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
ShubhamsabooShubhamsaboo
131.7k

email-drafter

Draft professional emails with subject/body templates and tone controls.

Community
Basic
icerain-cmdicerain-cmd
15

responding-to-peer-review

Organize reviewer comments into traceable revision records and response drafts.

Community
Advanced
THUFanZdTHUFanZd

novelty-check

Extract method claims and search literature to generate a novelty report.

Community
Advanced
meanllbrlmeanllbrl
11

multi-review

Coordinate parallel specialist sub-agents to review code diffs and synthesize a final report.

Community
Advanced