review-skill

To validate Claude Code skills against best practices, run an automated review process that checks SKILL.md frontmatter validity, enforces zero major and minor issues, and verifies proper references usage per official guidelines.

Refactoring bloated skills is handled by automated validation and remediation tools that apply best-practice quality checks, auto-fix structural issues, and generate suggestions to streamline skill content for better discoverability.

Yes, you can automate quality checks for open-source skill contributions using external review and PR workflow modes that validate skill structure, enforce best practices, and gate contributions before merging into collections.

The best way to ensure SKILL.md frontmatter validity is running an automated QA evaluation checklist that inspects skill structure, applies Anthropic best practices, and remediates identified formatting or metadata issues.

Yes, the skill review process supports external review and PR workflows, allowing community contributors to validate skills against evaluation checklists, apply auto-fixes, and submit quality-gated contributions to open-source collections.

Skill validation reports major and minor issues when automated checks detect violations of Anthropic best practices, such as invalid SKILL.md frontmatter, improper references usage, or structural bloat that requires refactoring.