review-skill

Parse SKILL.md frontmatter and validate content against authoring conventions.

Updated Feb 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tvishwanadha/skills --skill review-skill-tvishwanadha
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-skill
Source: https://github.com/tvishwanadha/skills/tree/main/plugins/reviewer/skills/review-skill
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tvishwanadha/skills --skill review-skill-tvishwanadha

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? This skill helps auditors identify quality gaps in SKILL.md frontmatter and content across the project, ensuring consistency and adherence to authoring conventions.

Core Features & Use Cases - Validate frontmatter fields (name, description) and required structure. - Analyze changes to SKILL.md and related references to prevent regressions. - Generate remediation guidance and ensure cross-skill references stay consistent.

Quick Start Run a quality audit on a target SKILL.md or skill directory to surface issues and actionable fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-skill

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate SKILL.md frontmatter and content for convention adherence?

To validate SKILL.md frontmatter and content, apply a quality audit to a single file, a directory, or all skills to parse frontmatter, apply default and local rules, and verify reference integrity.

What is the best way to audit skill quality across a project directory?

The best way to audit skill quality across a project directory is to run a validation pass that identifies quality gaps in SKILL.md files, ensuring cross-skill references stay consistent and preventing regressions.

Does this skill quality validation require any external dependencies?

No external dependencies are required for this skill quality validation, allowing you to directly parse frontmatter, apply default and local rules, and verify references without prerequisite environment setup.

Why does my SKILL.md review flag missing frontmatter fields as quality gaps?

Your SKILL.md review flags missing frontmatter fields as quality gaps because the validation process checks required structure and fields like name and description to ensure adherence to authoring conventions.

Can I generate remediation guidance for inconsistent cross-skill references?

Yes, you can generate remediation guidance for inconsistent cross-skill references by running a quality audit that surfaces issues and actionable fixes, ensuring cross-skill references stay consistent.