Evaluate solution.md against architecture quality gates and amend findings.
npx skills add https://github.com/daddia/space --skill review-solution-daddia
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: review-solution Source: https://github.com/daddia/space/tree/main/.agents/skills/review-solution Command: npx skills add https://github.com/daddia/space --skill review-solution-daddia
Reviews solution.md as a Senior Solution Architect, checking structural soundness, section completeness, NFR specificity, ADR coverage, and drift from what was actually built. Amends the document and appends a verdict.
Provide solution.md to the reviewer and run the review-solution skill to obtain amendments and verdict.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To perform an architecture review, evaluate the solution.md against quality gates covering context, runtime, data model, deployment, ADRs, and risk. This identifies structural findings and generates an amended document with a final verdict.
A solution.md architecture review evaluates structural soundness, NFR specificity, and ADR coverage against quality goals. You need one for post-delivery or phase-ready documents, and when major changes occur that require re-validation.
Checking ADR coverage and document drift involves evaluating the solution.md against project context and architecture quality gates. The review identifies blocking and non-blocking findings, amends the document, and appends a concise summary.
Yes, you can apply architecture quality gates to ensure section completeness and NFR specificity before sign-off. The review process checks cross-cutting concepts and deployment views, producing an amended solution.md and a recorded verdict.
Reviewing solution documents for architectural risk focuses strictly on evaluating provided solution.md content against quality gates. It requires post-delivery or phase-ready documents and is triggered when major changes necessitate re-validation.
The best way to document architecture findings is to generate a concise review summary alongside an amended solution.md. This summary records both blocking and non-blocking findings while appending a final architectural verdict.
daddiaCreate ADR-NNNN.md files from solution.md with a provided template.
RomainDECOSTERReview Git diffs for correctness, quality, and security before merging.
FernanSuozaDraft arc42 architecture documents with embedded REQ sections and traceable decisions.
wyhlovecppAnalyzes Typst academic papers for language quality and formatting compliance.
