review-spec-local

Provide repo-specific spec-review guidance for oz-for-oss with required sections and linking conventions.

292|39|Updated Mar 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss --skill review-spec-local
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-spec-local
Source: https://github.com/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss/tree/main/.agents/skills/review-spec-local
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss --skill review-spec-local

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Repo-specific spec-review guidance for oz-for-oss. Only the categories declared overridable by the core review-spec skill may be specialized here.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Provides repo-specific guidelines for spec reviews in oz-for-oss, ensuring consistency with the core review-spec.
  • Documents required spec sections (product.md and tech.md) and repository conventions, including a top-level heading referencing the originating GitHub issue by number.
  • Specifies repository-link conventions and how to reference specs with repo-root-relative paths to keep specs navigable and maintainable.

Quick Start

Consult this guide when reviewing specs in oz-for-oss to apply the repo-defined overridable categories.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-spec-local

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review specs for an open-source repository to ensure consistent quality?

To review specs for an open-source repository, you must scope review expectations to the specific repo and outline required sections like product.md and tech.md, ensuring consistent spec quality and alignment with core guidelines.

What linking conventions should I use when referencing specs in a repository?

Referencing specs in a repository requires using repo-root-relative paths. This convention keeps specifications navigable and maintainable by ensuring links remain valid regardless of where the documentation is accessed within the repository structure.

What sections are required for a complete specification document in oz-for-oss?

A complete specification document in oz-for-oss requires both a product.md and tech.md section. Additionally, the spec needs a top-level heading referencing the originating GitHub issue by number to maintain proper tracking and context.

Can I redefine the output schema when providing repo-specific spec-review guidance?

No, you cannot redefine the output schema when providing repo-specific spec-review guidance. You must ensure alignment with the core review-spec skill and may only specialize categories explicitly declared as overridable by the core skill.

When do I need specialized spec-review guidance instead of using a core review skill?

You need specialized spec-review guidance when a repository has unique conventions, such as specific linking paths or required heading formats referencing GitHub issues. This specialization allows you to apply repo-defined overridable categories without altering the core schema.