review

A 5-pass code review automates structured analysis by checking correctness, security, performance, readability, and consistency. It surfaces defects and security gaps across files or directories, delivering findings grouped by pass and severity for actionable remediation.

Yes, you can review diffs instead of the full codebase. The static analysis evaluates contextual diff hunks to isolate quality issues and security gaps specifically within your recent changes, ensuring targeted and fast quality checks.

The best way to check for security gaps and code quality issues is a structured 5-pass review. It evaluates security and best practices alongside correctness, surfacing blind spots and accelerating approvals through a severity-grouped findings report.

Yes, the static analysis follows existing project conventions. During the consistency pass, it evaluates your code against established project standards to ensure the structured review aligns with your repository's specific reporting and formatting requirements.

Code review findings are reported and grouped by pass and severity. This structured output categorizes defects, security gaps, and quality issues discovered during the 5-pass workflow, delivering actionable remediation steps for developers.

A limitation of automated static analysis is that it focuses on surfacing defects, security gaps, and quality issues based on code patterns. It may not catch complex business logic flaws, requiring human oversight during the final approval process.