skills.rest
Lichens-Innovation
Lichens-InnovationOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

review-staged-changes

Review staged git diffs against a standardized quality rubric.

Updated Feb 20, 2026
Search Tags:#feedback#readability#maintainability#review#diff#code-quality#staged-changes
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Lichens-Innovation/ai-dev-tools --skill review-staged-changes
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-staged-changes
Source: https://github.com/Lichens-Innovation/ai-dev-tools/tree/main/skills/review-staged-changes
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Lichens-Innovation/ai-dev-tools --skill review-staged-changes

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Reviews staged git changes to ensure they improve code quality, maintainability, and readability without introducing regressions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Review staged diffs for issues before commit.
  • Provide structured feedback using the templates/review-summary.md.
  • Guide enhancements for maintainability and readability.

Quick Start

Review the currently staged changes to generate a structured feedback report.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-staged-changes

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review staged git changes for code quality and regressions?▼

Review staged git changes by evaluating the diff against a standardized rubric covering contextual sense, regression prevention, maintainability, and readability to ensure code quality and safety before integration.

What is the best way to check a git diff for maintainability before committing?▼

Checking a git diff for maintainability involves applying a standardized rubric during local reviews or pull request checks to guide enhancements and ensure the staged changes improve code readability and evolvability.

How does staged code review prevent regressions during pull request checks?▼

Staged code review prevents regressions by analyzing the git diff using a standardized rubric that specifically evaluates regression prevention, providing structured feedback before integration occurs.

Can I use a standardized rubric to review local git diffs for readability?▼

Yes, you can review local git diffs for readability by applying a standardized rubric with dedicated readability sections to evaluate and guide enhancements for staged code changes.

What does a structured code review summary include for staged changes?▼

A structured code review summary for staged changes includes feedback generated from a template, covering contextual sense, regression prevention, maintainability, evolvability, and readability.

Are there limitations to reviewing staged diffs for potential regressions?▼

Reviewing staged diffs for regressions is limited to analyzing the provided code changes and does not execute tests, meaning it offers guidance on potential regressions rather than definitive runtime validation.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
terakoya76terakoya76

review

Automate code review of uncommitted git changes with a reviewer subagent.

Community
Basic
eglenn-deveglenn-dev
1

pr-summary

Generates a structured pull-request summary from git diff, file list, commit history.

Community
Basic
Chang-Shih-YungChang-Shih-Yung

health

Aggregate type checker, linter, and test results into a 0-10 composite score.

Community
Advanced
vrcmsvrcms
1

verification-loop

Execute build, type, lint, test, and security checks in a verification pipeline.

Community
Advanced