review-standards

Analyze codebases for DRY violations, test coverage gaps, and standards conformance.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/fweiner/life-words --skill review-standards-fweiner
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-standards
Source: https://github.com/fweiner/life-words/tree/main/.claude/skills/review-standards
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/fweiner/life-words --skill review-standards-fweiner

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates a comprehensive review of a codebase to identify DRY violations, thin client and router adherence issues, gaps in test coverage, and security and project-standards compliance, enabling faster, more consistent quality checks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured code audits across backend services, frontend routers, and overall architecture to surface duplications, anti-patterns, and conformance gaps.
  • Agent-based review: Launch parallel Sonnet agents to review independently and synthesize findings into a final report.
  • Use Case: Run a standards review on a new codebase to surface DRY violations and routing inconsistencies before release.

Quick Start

Provide the target codebase path or scope to begin a standards review.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-standards

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review to check for DRY violations and security issues?

Automated code review identifies DRY violations and security issues by analyzing the codebase to surface duplications and conformance gaps. It evaluates backend services and frontend routers to provide actionable findings with recommended mitigations.

How do I audit frontend routing adherence and thin client architecture?

Frontend routing adherence and thin client architecture are audited by analyzing the codebase against project standards. The review checks router configurations and client-side logic to identify anti-patterns and architectural inconsistencies.

What is the best way to find test coverage gaps across a full codebase?

Finding test coverage gaps across a full codebase involves analyzing the source code to identify untested paths and missing test implementations. The review evaluates the entire project structure to report objective coverage findings.

Can I validate my project against CLAUDE.md guidelines automatically?

Validating your project against CLAUDE.md guidelines automatically is supported by running a standards review. The analysis checks the codebase for conformance to these specific project standards and reports deviations with actionable mitigations.

Does automated standards review work for both backend services and frontend routers?

Automated standards review does work for both backend services and frontend routers. The analysis applies across the full codebase architecture, evaluating each layer independently before synthesizing the findings into a final report.

What are the limitations of running an agent-based codebase standards review?

Agent-based codebase standards review is limited by its reliance on the provided codebase path or scope. It requires clear scoping to function effectively and focuses strictly on DRY, security, testing, and routing conformance rather than functional behavior.