review

You can identify SQL safety issues in PR diffs by applying structured risk analysis that evaluates query construction and execution paths. This surfaces potential injection vulnerabilities and unsafe query patterns before the code lands.

Checking LLM trust boundaries during code review involves evaluating how user inputs interact with LLM prompts in the diff. This surfaces prompt-injection risks and unsafe data handoffs between system components to guide secure merging.

Automated PR checks can surface conditional side effects by applying predefined prompts and structured analysis to the diff. This identifies hidden state mutations or unexpected behaviors triggered under specific conditions before landing.

Performing a pre-landing review for SQL safety and side effects requires evaluating the diff's query logic and conditional execution paths. This provides a structured risk assessment with recommended actions to prevent unsafe merges.

Diff-based analysis identifies SQL safety issues, LLM prompt-injection vulnerabilities, and conditional side-effect problems. It evaluates trust boundaries and execution paths to proactively surface risks and guide reviewer decisions.

You need to run a structured risk assessment on a pull request during code reviews, pre-landing checks, or when asked to review a diff. This is required when changes involve SQL queries, LLM interactions, or complex conditional logic.