review

Audit pull requests for correctness, UX, integration contracts, and KPI impact.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sujithatzackriya/skills --skill review-sujithatzackriya
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/sujithatzackriya/skills/tree/main/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sujithatzackriya/skills --skill review-sujithatzackriya

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you prevent merged code defects by producing a structured, end-to-end pull request review report that checks correctness, usability/UX, integration contracts, data accuracy, regression surface, and KPI impact.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Deep PR audits: Uses an opt-in --deep mode that pins rigorous WORKFLOW-A frameworks and forces call-path tracing plus per-finding reverification.
  • Structured PR review reporting: Produces a markdown report with categorized findings, verification verdicts, and (in --deep) “Findings reverified” and “Frameworks used” in the TL;DR.
  • Scales to large PRs: Supports multi-agent parallel review for larger diffs and consolidates results.
  • Optional codex reconciliation: Runs or coordinates an independent codex review pass to compare findings and improve confidence.

Quick Start

Run: /review 123 and answer the codex opt-in prompt to receive a thorough PR review report.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a deep audit on a pull request to check regression risks?

A deep pull request audit uses call-path sweeps and falsification tests to verify correctness, UX, integration contracts, and regression surface. You can trigger this rigorous review mode by using the optional --deep flag during your PR review.

What is the best way to review large pull requests with multiple agents?

Reviewing large pull requests is handled by multi-agent parallel review, which scans the diff concurrently and consolidates results. This scales the code review process to ensure comprehensive regression surface and data accuracy analysis.

Can I reconcile code review findings with an independent codex pass?

Yes, you can run an independent codex review pass to compare findings and improve confidence. This optional codex reconciliation is governed by an opt-in gate that prompts you before executing the comparative analysis.

Does the pull request review report cover UX verification and integration contracts?

The pull request review report explicitly audits UX verification and integration contracts. It produces a structured markdown document with categorized findings and verification verdicts covering these specific areas.

How do I start reviewing a pull request by branch or URL?

You can review a pull request by providing its number, URL, or branch name. The review process generates a structured markdown report auditing correctness, data accuracy, and KPI impact.

What frameworks are used during a deep code review?

A deep code review pins rigorous WORKFLOW-A frameworks to force call-path tracing and per-finding reverification. The specific frameworks used are listed in the TL;DR of the generated review report.