review

Automate staged code reviews across security, quality, and architecture.

Updated Mar 3, 2026

Search Tags:#automation #verification #code-review #architect #security-review #review-pipeline

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/sukeun1997/claude-config --skill review-sukeun1997

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/sukeun1997/claude-config/tree/main/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sukeun1997/claude-config --skill review-sukeun1997

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

이 스킬은 구현 인터뷰를 포함한 다단계 코드 리뷰를 자동화하여 팀의 피로를 줄이고 품질을 높입니다.

Core Features & Use Cases

End-to-end review pipeline: 구현 인터뷰에서 시작해 다중 에이전트 리뷰와 크리틱 통합, 수정/검증/커밋까지 하나의 파이프라인으로 수행합니다.
Granular, evidence-based outputs: AUTO-FIX/ASK 작업을 구조화된 형식으로 제공하고, 병렬 리뷰어를 활용해 사이클을 단축합니다.
Use Case: 복잡한 프로젝트에서 컴플라이언스와 아키텍처 감독이 필요한 팀이 반복 가능하고 재현 가능한 리뷰를 원할 때 적용합니다.

Quick Start

Trigger /review on a project to run the full review pipeline from implementation interview to commit.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate end-to-end code reviews and approvals for complex projects?▼

Automated end-to-end code reviews run a staged review pipeline from implementation interview to commit, covering code, security, quality, and architecture risk assessments with multi-agent coordination and evidence-based verification.

What is a multi-agent review pipeline and how does it handle code quality and security?▼

A multi-agent review pipeline uses parallel reviewers to evaluate code, security, quality, and architecture simultaneously, integrating critiques and providing structured AUTO-FIX or ASK actions to shorten the review cycle.

Can I use automated code review for iterative feedback and automated fixes?▼

Automated code review supports iterative feedback and automated fixes by applying structured AUTO-FIX actions across a staged pipeline, followed by evidence-based verification and automated commits for reproducible results.

Does automated code review work for architecture oversight and compliance requirements?▼

Automated code review suits teams requiring compliance and architecture oversight by performing phase-based evaluations and risk assessments, ensuring repeatable and reproducible reviews across complex software projects.

What's the best way to run a comprehensive code review pipeline from implementation to commit?▼

Triggering a full review pipeline starts with an implementation interview, then executes multi-agent reviews, integrates critiques, applies fixes, verifies results, and commits changes in one automated flow.

When should I not use an automated code review pipeline?▼

Avoid automated code review pipelines for simple tasks lacking iterative feedback needs or when a project does not require multi-agent coordination, architecture oversight, or compliance validation.