review

Automate staged code reviews across security, quality, and architecture.

Updated Mar 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sukeun1997/claude-config --skill review-sukeun1997
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/sukeun1997/claude-config/tree/main/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sukeun1997/claude-config --skill review-sukeun1997

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

이 스킬은 구현 인터뷰를 포함한 다단계 코드 리뷰를 자동화하여 팀의 피로를 줄이고 품질을 높입니다.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • End-to-end review pipeline: 구현 인터뷰에서 시작해 다중 에이전트 리뷰와 크리틱 통합, 수정/검증/커밋까지 하나의 파이프라인으로 수행합니다.
  • Granular, evidence-based outputs: AUTO-FIX/ASK 작업을 구조화된 형식으로 제공하고, 병렬 리뷰어를 활용해 사이클을 단축합니다.
  • Use Case: 복잡한 프로젝트에서 컴플라이언스와 아키텍처 감독이 필요한 팀이 반복 가능하고 재현 가능한 리뷰를 원할 때 적용합니다.

Quick Start

Trigger /review on a project to run the full review pipeline from implementation interview to commit.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate end-to-end code reviews and approvals for complex projects?

Automated end-to-end code reviews run a staged review pipeline from implementation interview to commit, covering code, security, quality, and architecture risk assessments with multi-agent coordination and evidence-based verification.

What is a multi-agent review pipeline and how does it handle code quality and security?

A multi-agent review pipeline uses parallel reviewers to evaluate code, security, quality, and architecture simultaneously, integrating critiques and providing structured AUTO-FIX or ASK actions to shorten the review cycle.

Can I use automated code review for iterative feedback and automated fixes?

Automated code review supports iterative feedback and automated fixes by applying structured AUTO-FIX actions across a staged pipeline, followed by evidence-based verification and automated commits for reproducible results.

Does automated code review work for architecture oversight and compliance requirements?

Automated code review suits teams requiring compliance and architecture oversight by performing phase-based evaluations and risk assessments, ensuring repeatable and reproducible reviews across complex software projects.

What's the best way to run a comprehensive code review pipeline from implementation to commit?

Triggering a full review pipeline starts with an implementation interview, then executes multi-agent reviews, integrates critiques, applies fixes, verifies results, and commits changes in one automated flow.

When should I not use an automated code review pipeline?

Avoid automated code review pipelines for simple tasks lacking iterative feedback needs or when a project does not require multi-agent coordination, architecture oversight, or compliance validation.