skills.rest
takemi-ohama
takemi-ohamaCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

review

Review pull requests and return an Approve or Request Changes decision.

Updated Jan 30, 2026
Search Tags:#automation#decision#code-quality#software-engineering#pull-request#pr-review#review-criteria
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/takemi-ohama/ai-plugins --skill review-takemi-ohama
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/takemi-ohama/ai-plugins/tree/main/plugins/ndf/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/takemi-ohama/ai-plugins --skill review-takemi-ohama

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Reviews PRs by applying expert criteria to determine whether to Approve or Request Changes, reducing review time and ensuring consistency.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Deterministic evaluation: applies standardized review criteria to any PR.
  • Clear outcomes: returns an Approve or Request Changes decision with rationale.
  • Use Case: integrate into CI or manual workflows to accelerate code reviews.

Quick Start

Review the latest PR or a specified PR and return an approval decision with concise rationale.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate PR reviews to approve or request changes consistently?▼

Automate PR reviews by applying standardized evaluation criteria to the latest or specified pull request, returning a deterministic Approve or Request Changes decision with rationale to ensure consistency.

What is the best way to perform a quick code-quality check on an open pull request?▼

Perform a quick code-quality check by providing a PR identifier to the review system, which applies expert criteria across languages and repositories to return an approval decision and concise rationale.

Can I use deterministic review criteria for pull requests across different programming languages?▼

Yes, deterministic review criteria apply to any pull request across languages and repositories, enabling standardized code-quality analysis and consistent Approve or Request Changes outcomes.

How do I integrate automated code reviews into my CI or manual workflows?▼

Integrate automated code reviews into CI or manual workflows by passing the PR identifier to the review process, which enforces deterministic evaluation rules and returns a clear approval or request changes decision.

Does automated PR review require specific dependencies or components to function?▼

No, automated PR review operates without dependencies or components, requiring only the pull request identifier as input to evaluate code quality and return a deterministic decision.

Why should I use standardized criteria instead of manual code reviews for pull requests?▼

Standardized criteria reduce review time and ensure consistency by applying deterministic evaluation rules to any PR, eliminating subjective bias and returning clear Approve or Request Changes outcomes with rationale.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
granietgraniet
247

github-code-review

Analyze local git diffs and pull request changes for bugs and security issues.

Community
Intermediate
MisterVitoProMisterVitoPro

code-atlas:update

Incrementally update Code Atlas architecture index entries using file-hash diffing.

Community
Advanced
Sheldon-92Sheldon-92
3

Testing

Execute test suites and report failures with coverage metrics.

Community
Intermediate
OneWave-AIOneWave-AI
245

code-review-pro

Review code for security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and maintainability issues.

Official
Basic