review-team

Automate a GitHub PR review by ingesting the PR diff, ticket context, and project conventions to spawn a coordinated agent team. This workflow generates a structured JSON report with confidence-rated findings and a final synthesis.

Devil's Advocate cross-examination in code review is an adversarial filtering mechanism where one agent challenges findings from specialist agents. This surfaces only high-confidence issues by validating evidence against project conventions.

Structure PR review findings into a JSON report by applying the PR diff and project conventions to a team orchestration workflow. The process outputs confidence-rated findings and a final synthesis ready for user consumption.

Yes, you can use agent teams to inspect a pull request for convention conformance. The workflow spawns five roles, including four specialists and one Devil's Advocate, to validate code changes against established project conventions.

Team-based PR review operates without external dependencies, relying entirely on internal agent orchestration. It ingests PR diffs, ticket context, and project conventions to generate structured findings and a final synthesis report.

The best way to filter false positives in automated code review is using a Devil's Advocate cross-examination. An adversarial agent challenges specialist findings, validating evidence and confidence ratings before generating the final synthesis.