review-tech-checklist

Evaluate code and design quality across security, type-safety, error handling, performance, and style.

1|Updated Mar 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/froide-kk/michinushi --skill review-tech-checklist
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-tech-checklist
Source: https://github.com/froide-kk/michinushi/tree/main/review-tech-checklist
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/froide-kk/michinushi --skill review-tech-checklist

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Provides a structured, repeatable framework for technical code reviews, ensuring critical quality gates are consistently applied across security, typing, error handling, performance, and architectural consistency.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Security checks: verify authentication, authorization, data handling, and protection against common threats.
  • Type-safety and error handling: ensure explicit null handling and safe type usage.
  • Performance and quality: identify potential bottlenecks and enforce coding best practices.
  • Consistency with existing patterns: align with project conventions and ADR-style documentation.
  • Use Case: apply during code review cycles to produce a standardized checklist-driven report.

Quick Start

Run the reviewer agent on your codebase to perform the full set of checks and generate a findings report.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-tech-checklist

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is a systematic technical code review checklist?

A technical code review checklist provides a structured, repeatable framework to evaluate code quality. It organizes criteria for security, type-safety, error handling, performance, and consistency into bite-sized auditable checkpoints.

How do I perform a security and type-safety code review?

To perform security and type-safety code reviews, apply a structured checklist verifying authentication, authorization, data handling, and explicit null handling. This generates a standardized findings report identifying potential bottlenecks and threats.

Can I use a code review checklist to enforce project consistency and ADR patterns?

Yes, you can use this code review checklist to enforce project consistency by aligning code with existing conventions and ADR-style documentation. It evaluates architectural consistency alongside performance and coding best practices.

What's the best way to standardize error handling and performance checks across software projects?

The best way to standardize error handling and performance checks is applying a repeatable quality gate framework. This ensures explicit safe type usage and bottleneck identification are consistently evaluated across software projects during review cycles.

Does a structured code review checklist work for generating auditable findings reports?

Yes, a structured code review checklist works for generating auditable findings reports. It satisfies requirements for repeatable guidance by organizing categories and criteria into bite-sized items, producing a standardized checklist-driven report.